Teams

3.0 Team

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs Parks/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJuan Manuel Urquiza / Thomas Styles vs Wilson Hammond / Zachary Berning0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBurke Arthur / Scott Martz vs Jay Moneyhun / Todd Blowers3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Hoffman / Cliff Brooks vs Brandon Parks / Joe Michalik6-4, 6-4
2025-12-07vs Gross/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Wright / Juan Manuel Urquiza vs Jeff Pewitt / Edmon Begoli1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Barrett / Jay Slagle vs Jeff Gross / David Young1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesZakir Shaikh / Thomas Styles vs Sam Luttrell / Gregory Snodgrass1-6, 3-6
2025-11-15vs Gross/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJuan Manuel Urquiza / Cliff Brooks vs Jeff Pewitt / Wade Shrivalle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZakir Shaikh / Chris Wright vs Edmon Begoli / Don Moster2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJustin Stivers vs Mike Mansoor7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-09vs Parks/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Martz / Jay Slagle vs Daniel Park / Todd Blowers1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBurke Arthur / Juan Manuel Urquiza vs Brandon Parks / Nicholas Panella3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJohn Hoffman / Zhigang Hu vs Andy Crook / Joe Michalik1-6, 4-6
2025-10-26vs Parks/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesLandon Finley / Chris Wright vs Brandon Parks / Brett Carroll3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesZhigang Hu vs Todd Blowers0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBurke Arthur / John Hoffman vs Andy Crook / Wilson Hammond3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Huddleston / Thomas Styles vs Joe Michalik / Nicholas Panella7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-25vs Gross/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesMatthew Huddleston / Thomas Styles vs Edmon Begoli / Thomas Shirley0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJustin Stivers vs Shawn Huffman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBurke Arthur / Chris Wright vs Don Moster / David Young0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCliff Brooks / Zhigang Hu vs Mike Mansoor / Gregory Snodgrass1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13.0 Team1582245300

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Justin Stivers
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.79
Chris Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Juan Manuel Urquiza
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Zakir Shaikh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Zhigang Hu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.70
Scott Martz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Cliff Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.48
Matthew Huddleston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Burke Arthur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Thomas Styles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jay Slagle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Stivers
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Chris Wright
0W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Juan Manuel Urquiza
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Zakir Shaikh
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Zhigang Hu
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Scott Martz
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cliff Brooks
6W–16L career · 11 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Matthew Huddleston
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Burke Arthur
9W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.45
Thomas Styles
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.36
Jay Slagle
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.