Teams

SFV - Volley Llamas

2025 Adult 18 Weekday SFV · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Brett Bennett
published 3.5
3.48
Esther Hwang
published
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
published
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Holly Wolfle Hall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Jenny Lin
published
3.31
Nancy Pashayan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Justine Lassoff
published
3.29
Erin Mand
published
3.15
Patricia Friedman
published
3.08
Theresa Sterling
published
3.07
Tammy Scher
published
3.04
Jeanette Onorati
published
2.93
Stacy Ball
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.86
Sophia Chang
published
2.86
Kristen Stills
published
2.72
Brooke Alberts
published 3
2.64
Beverly Wilkerson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justine Lassoff + Margie Englis314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Bevan + Brett Bennett134 matchesnot enough data
Margie Englis + Brett Bennett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Bennett
65W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Esther Hwang
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Jennifer Bevan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Holly Wolfle Hall
67W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Jenny Lin
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Nancy Pashayan
61W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Justine Lassoff
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Erin Mand
22W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Patricia Friedman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Theresa Sterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Tammy Scher
4W–26L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Jeanette Onorati
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Sophia Chang
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Kristen Stills
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Brooke Alberts
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Beverly Wilkerson
71W–109L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.