Teams

C3 Salisbury-Riegel

2024 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-08vs H8 Raintree HouffLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Jeff Brown vs Brad Houff / Carey Donovan1-6, 4-6
2024-07-11vs Mid-Atlantic/Stephens/55&Over8.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Blackburn / John Spichiger vs Jonathan Brew / Todd Furbee1-6, 3-6
2024-07-03vs E5 Belmont Big Nasty - PfeifferLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Blackburn / Whitley Day vs Jeff Bosch / Chris Naughton2-6, 2-6
2024-06-20vs H8 Raintree HouffLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Spichiger / Michael Blackburn vs Eddie Parker / ED Fuhr2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Michael Blackburn
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
James Chicklo
published
3.34
Taylor Clarke
published
3.33
John Spichiger
published
Dean Deaver
published 3.5
3.23
Dan Riegel
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Blackburn
172W–174L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
James Chicklo
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.35
Taylor Clarke
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
John Spichiger
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dean Deaver
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dan Riegel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.