Teams

KSummers (Foxcroft East)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-03vs JMiles (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLoreley Banchik / Theresa Mount vs Penelope Powell / Kirsten Dodd1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Peggy Reimann vs Melissa McVey / Gladys Shinmoto5-7, 3-6
2022-04-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Peggy Reimann vs Barrie Harris / Jennifer Hall3-6, 5-7
2022-04-19vs KRuettgers/KHolbrook (Pine Lake)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesClaire Buie / Virginia Borkey vs Kammy Ruettgers / Lauren Stikeleather2-6, 1-6
2022-04-12vs MMetzl (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesLoreley Banchik vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Moore / Peggy Reimann vs Sarah Asby / Martha Metzl0-6, 0-6
2022-04-10vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLoreley Banchik vs Alisa Longo6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-29vs JMiles (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPeggy Reimann / Virginia Borkey vs Jennifer Miles / Kirsten Dodd5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-22vs BHarris/KMoss (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaire Buie / Loreley Banchik vs Barrie Harris / Mindy Rooney2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Peggy Reimann vs Elizabeth Myers / Jennifer Frost4-6, 1-6
2022-03-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesClaire Buie / Virginia Borkey vs Beth Barnes / Wendy Welch2-6, 3-6
2022-03-01vs MMetzl (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesVirginia Borkey / Claire Buie vs Sarah Asby / Holly Foley1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLoreley Banchik / Karen Summers vs Lisa Dunning / Kyna Savedge0-6, 2-6
2022-02-22vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLoreley Banchik / Lisa Moore vs Kate Kadijevic / Courtney Slavin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Caroline Hobson
published 3.5
3.12
Peggy Reimann
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Loreley Banchik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Ashley Kreth
published 3
2.36
Virginia Borkey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Karen Summers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Reimann + Virginia Borkey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Hobson
45W–51L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Peggy Reimann
104W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.12
3
Loreley Banchik
16W–27L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Ashley Kreth
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Virginia Borkey
23W–56L career · type S · 10 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.36
Karen Summers
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.