Teams

JWilder (Mason Wallace)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Mon PM

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-28vs DHaake (WSRC)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesNick Larsen vs Brad Lucas7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJared Wilder vs Justin Young6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-24vs DFerraro (Mason Wallace)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesNick Larsen vs Griffin Mann6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJared Wilder vs Drew Tomsho2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesJames Probel vs Robert Eskridge0-6, 1-6
2025-07-21vs PTighe (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJared Wilder vs PATRICK TIGHE2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJames Probel vs Harry Werner4-6, 4-6
2025-07-07vs DHaake (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesNick Larsen vs Jonathan Spensieri6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTony Cardwell vs Dwayne Trantham0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJames Probel vs Justin Young0-6, 0-6
2025-06-30vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 21
W#1 SinglesNick Larsen vs Brian Hegner6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJared Wilder vs PATRICK TIGHE0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesTony Cardwell vs Harry Werner6-0, 6-3
2025-06-26vs DHaake (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesNick Larsen vs Brad Lucas6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJared Wilder vs Dana Haake1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJames Probel vs MAGESH ARUMUGAM0-6, 0-6
2025-06-23vs DFerraro (Mason Wallace)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJared Wilder vs Dominic Ferraro0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJames Probel vs Griffin Mann0-6, 0-6
2025-06-09vs PTighe (Blakeney)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesNick Larsen vs PATRICK TIGHE6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTony Cardwell vs Sanith Ray2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJames Probel vs Ron Rossi0-6, 0-6
2025-06-02vs DFerraro (Mason Wallace)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesNick Larsen vs Dominic Ferraro6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTony Cardwell vs Drew Tomsho3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJared Wilder vs Griffin Mann0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DFerraro (Mason Wallace)8120715161
2DHaake (WSRC)7222514136
3JWilder (Mason Wallace)1862142263

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Nick Larsen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
James Probel
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 2.5
Jared Wilder
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Tony Cardwell
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Larsen
17W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
2.5
James Probel
0W–6L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jared Wilder
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Cardwell
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.