Lakewood/Diaz-Weeks W3.5
2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday
14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule9 played
i
Flight standings17 teams · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Chandlers Landing/Carlyle-Lee W3.5 | 9 | 0 | 29 | 285 |
| 2Northwood/Calvert W3.5 | 8 | 1 | 25 | 264 |
| 3Lakes @CH/Boronski-Lewis W3.5 | 8 | 1 | 25 | 269 |
| 4DAC/Fuquay-Myers W3.5 | 7 | 2 | 23 | 250 |
| 5The Nelson/Alexander-Eschenburg W3.5 | 6 | 3 | 27 | 235 |
| 6SpringPark/Bradley W3.5 | 6 | 3 | 37 | 294 |
| 7Canyon Creek/Whitaker-Bates W3.5 | 6 | 3 | 38 | 318 |
| 8JCC/Kaplan-Grubstein W3.5 | 5 | 4 | 40 | 306 |
| 9Lakewood/Diaz-Weeks W3.5 | 4 | 5 | 43 | 322 |
| 10Royal Oaks/Bradford-Copley W3.5 | 3 | 5 | 36 | 287 |
| 11Stonebridge Ranch/Cantu-Murphy W3.5 | 3 | 5 | 39 | 287 |
| 12T bar M/LeRosen-Myhre W3.5 | 3 | 5 | 40 | 310 |
| 13Gleneagles/Bartlett-Priebe W3.5 | 3 | 6 | 52 | 368 |
| 14Fretz/Griffiths-Sullivan W3.5 | 2 | 7 | 53 | 392 |
| 15Bent Tree/Sarché W3.5 | 2 | 7 | 54 | 362 |
| 16Las Colinas/Demarque-Scopa W3.5 | 1 | 8 | 56 | 403 |
| 17LB Houston/Lodewick-Gregory W3.5 | 1 | 8 | 64 | 397 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Alexandra Klitsch + Frances Knipp | 6–3 | 53% games | −12.8% vs expected |
| Mindy Satterwhite + Lindsey Diaz | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Alexandra Klitsch + Allison Methvin | 4–0 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Brooke McGonigle + Allison Methvin | 2–1 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Mindy Satterwhite + Sarah Ringwald | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Allison Methvin + Bess Weeks | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Allison Methvin + Sloan Dix | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Bess Weeks + Lindsey Diaz | 2–1 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.