Teams

Weber/Farmington/FAC

2026 Combo 18 & Over 2.5, 6.5, 8.5, 10.5 · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 9 12:00 AM
Matrix Racquet Club
Sep 16 12:00 AM
Fayetteville Athletic Club
Sep 23 12:00 AM
Shadow Valley Country Club
Sep 30 12:00 AM
Fayetteville Athletic Club
Oct 7 12:00 AM
Kingsdale Tennis Center
2026-01-17vs Fenton/Fayetteville/SRCSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAnindhitha Sudhakaran vs Sarah Paschal1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLindsay Page vs Sydney Adair6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-18Split 11
L#1 SinglesAnindhitha Sudhakaran vs Courtney Kleinebreil2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Bright vs Michelle van Schenck6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hradsky/Bentonville/MRC000000
2Schutz-Greaser/Springdale/SRC000000
3Guido/Bentonville/IND000000
4Weber/Farmington/FAC000000
5Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC000000
6Liipfert-Beere/Bentonville/KTC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Sarah Bright
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Laura Kryzanowsky
published
3.10
Tiffany Harris
published
3.05
Anindhitha Sudhakaran
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Jenna Donnell
published
2.96
Natalie Lindsey
published
2.95
Lindsay Page
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Brandy Long
published 3
2.82
Carolina Gomez
published 3
2.75
Nastassja Riley
published
2.64
Jena Newman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolina Gomez + Lindsay Page404 matchesnot enough data
Anindhitha Sudhakaran + Sarah Bright213 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Long + Lindsay Page123 matchesnot enough data
Jena Newman + Jenna Donnell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bright
33W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.41
Laura Kryzanowsky
14W–18L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Tiffany Harris
23W–22L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Anindhitha Sudhakaran
2W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jenna Donnell
36W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Natalie Lindsey
7W–24L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Lindsay Page
44W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Brandy Long
28W–17L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Carolina Gomez
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Nastassja Riley
20W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Jena Newman
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.