Teams

Who Is We? Flipper Grillers

2026 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-29vs DJ KittenWon 20
W#1 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs William Wray6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSandipp Rou Perepu vs Eric Yaffe6-1, 6-0
2026-08-29vs BreakersWon 10
W#2 SinglesArvind Jairam vs Kevin Chiong6-2, 6-2
2026-08-15vs Cedar SprintLost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Bent vs Soren Schmidt1-6, 1-6
2026-08-01vs BreakersWon 20
W#1 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Marvin Martinez6-2, 5-5
W#3 SinglesAlex Saunders vs Kevin Chiong6-0, 6-0
2026-07-26vs We're Tennis FriendsWon 10
W#3 SinglesArvind Jairam vs Logan Kwan6-2, 6-3
2026-07-25vs Cedar SprintWon 10
W#1 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs Ali Hamdani6-2, 6-1
2026-07-05vs DJ KittenWon 30
W#1 SinglesJesse Cebulash vs William Doan6-2, 5-2
W#2 SinglesSandipp Rou Perepu vs Bradley Kesling0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAlex Saunders vs Eric Yaffe6-0, 6-3
2026-06-20Won 10
W#3 SinglesMatthew Bent vs Aadil Bangash6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cedar Sprint0712917149
2Khoality Balls07101125179
3Who Is We? Flipper Grillers08111324200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Jesse Cebulash
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.98
Sandipp Rou Perepu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.86
Alex Saunders
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.84
Arvind Jairam
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Daniel Jones
published 4
3.71
Matthew Bent
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandipp Rou Perepu + Arvind Jairam6162% gamesnot enough data
Sandipp Rou Perepu + Jesse Cebulash3452% gamesnot enough data
Arvind Jairam + Jesse Cebulash303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jesse Cebulash
332W–110L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Sandipp Rou Perepu
135W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Alex Saunders
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Arvind Jairam
118W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Daniel Jones
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Matthew Bent
58W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.