Teams

Seminole Lake Smash Girls

2026 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Sat (4 cts)

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-20vs Innisbrook Forty LoveSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Fischer / Dolores Salazar vs Mona Patel / Bev Tannenbaum1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShannon Connolly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Stacey Castellini vs Maresol Wehner / Melissa Bryan6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Shinners / Rachel Karioki vs Lisa Connolly / Christie Rock6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-13vs Bardmoor GrossLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Fischer / Kim Poynter vs Debbie Dawson / Emily Signoracci6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDolores Salazar vs Tamara Tindell2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Stacey Castellini vs Kathleen Betancourt / Terri Kiefer0-6, 1-6
2026-06-06vs RCSP FaraciSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDolores Salazar / Stacey Castellini vs Linda Mulcahy / Corrie Stover4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Fischer / Martha Cornatzer vs Biatta Malkiewicz / Heather Callahan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-30vs McMullen Ebony & IvoryLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Fischer / Shannon Connolly vs Joan Whitten / Tricia Lolkus3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Higgins / Jane Maxwell vs Sally Farkas / Katie Tihanovich2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDolores Salazar / Stacey Castellini vs Esthela Gonzalez / Eileen Rodriguez4-6, 1-6
2026-05-16vs Ardea SweetshotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth Higgins / Jane Maxwell vs Ana Jara / Robin Gerlach6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJanuary Moennig / Kim Poynter vs Lisa Patides / Fayola Goldstone6-2, 6-2
2026-05-02vs SPTC Holliday 3.5 WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Shinners / Jane Maxwell vs Kristi Downs / Kenzier McIntyre3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Fischer / Kim Poynter vs Diane Haymes / Jennifer Hobbs1-6, 4-6
2026-04-25vs Seminole Lake PriceSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Fischer / Shannon Connolly vs Shelley Williams / Lina Chaves6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJanuary Moennig / Amy Burns vs Christine Price / Sally Blush4-6, 6-7
2026-04-18vs PINELLAS/RodriguesLost 13
L#1 DoublesRachel Karioki / Kristen Shinners vs Nelci Rodrigues / Pippin Gilbert1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHaley Dowlen vs Nicky Baumohl5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanuary Moennig / Cindy Kim vs Katherine Cowley / Liz Newman0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Higgins / Karen Fischer vs Joanne Law / Kristin McCormick5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Sat (4 cts) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Beth Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jane Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Shannon Connolly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Cindy Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Haley Dowlen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Amy Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Rachel Karioki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Dolores Salazar
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
January Moennig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Karen Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Kristen Shinners
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Martha Cornatzer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Stacey Castellini
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Poynter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sherrl Fry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Maxwell + Beth Higgins1543% games+0.9% vs expected
Stacey Castellini + Martha Cornatzer51941% games−14.5% vs expected
Kristen Shinners + Rachel Karioki1434% games−14.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Higgins
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Jane Maxwell
114W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Shannon Connolly
16W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cindy Kim
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Haley Dowlen
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Amy Burns
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Rachel Karioki
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Dolores Salazar
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
January Moennig
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
Karen Fischer
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Kristen Shinners
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Stacey Castellini
23W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Kim Poynter
31W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Sherrl Fry
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.