Teams

GAC BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs SSH GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Seaberg / Chelsea Ye vs Karen Allen / Toni Hipp3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJuliet Beckman vs Shiela Enser0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Deline / Stacie Hochstadt vs Beverly Tellis / Adrienne Wilson5-7, 4-6
2021-07-13vs LTFC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKatie Deline / Chelsea Ye vs Cindy Gordon / Barb Hedges6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJuliet Beckman vs Kristin Paulsen6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKhanh Huyen / Angela Seaberg vs Lori Benson / Katherine Hahn6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKingsley Parsley / Kirsten Handler vs Colleen Carlson / Carol Jochens2-6, 3-6
2021-07-06vs ATC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews / Chelsea Ye vs Samantha Goffinet / Kelly Hardy0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKhanh Huyen vs Kerry Warburton6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJuliet Beckman / Angela Seaberg vs Lyn Rales / Meg Kindsfater4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKirsten Handler / Kingsley Parsley vs Tracy Kerr / Winslow Waxter6-0, 6-1
2021-06-29vs APR BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesStacie Hochstadt / Chelsea Ye vs Lauren Perry / Deborah Weis7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJuliet Beckman vs Michelle Topf7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews / Angela Seaberg vs Julie Lang / Clare Morey6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKingsley Parsley / Kirsten Handler vs Stephanie Finnigan / Jackie Hawkey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-23vs SSH GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesChelsea Ye / Suzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews vs Anja Mapstone / Tracy Hudson1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKhanh Huyen vs Shiela Enser6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKingsley Parsley / Kirsten Handler vs Adrienne Wilson / Toni Hipp3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJuliet Beckman / Angela Seaberg vs Cindy McLemore / Beverly Tellis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-22vs SSLGT REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesChelsea Ye / Angela Seaberg vs Alisa Phelps / Tara Sonenstein6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKhanh Huyen vs Elaine Gailloux6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJuliet Beckman / Suzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews vs Marcela Rascon / Lindsey Markley0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKirsten Handler / Kingsley Parsley vs Erin Johnston / Kristine Smith6-4, 6-2
2021-06-08vs LTFC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews / Angela Seaberg vs Bridget Murdock / Rebecca Pulick1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesChelsea Ye vs Melissa Griese6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJuliet Beckman / Jeanine Murphy vs Katherine Hahn / Cindy Gordon6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKingsley Parsley / Kirsten Handler vs Maribeth Hanzlik / Carol Jochens3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Khanh Huyen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
Katie Deline
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Kirsten Handler
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.05
Chelsea Ye
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4.5
3.96
Angela Seaberg
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.94
Juliet Beckman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4.5
3.91
Kingsley Parsley
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
Jeanine Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacie Hochstadt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Suzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Deline + Chelsea Ye8857% games+2.4% vs expected
Kirsten Handler + Kingsley Parsley202748% games−0.6% vs expected
Juliet Beckman + Chelsea Ye3649% games−2.4% vs expected
Juliet Beckman + Katie Deline1438% games−20.8% vs expected
Juliet Beckman + Suzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews044 matchesnot enough data
Angela Seaberg + Chelsea Ye134 matchesnot enough data
Stacie Hochstadt + Kingsley Parsley314 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Handler + Juliet Beckman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Khanh Huyen
91W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Katie Deline
72W–60L career · 2 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Kirsten Handler
48W–57L career · 6 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Chelsea Ye
92W–114L career · 7 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Angela Seaberg
11W–24L career · type S · 7 lines in 2021
61%39%<1%
3.96
4.5
Juliet Beckman
57W–94L career · 7 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.94
4.5
Kingsley Parsley
39W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
3.91
Jeanine Murphy
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Stacie Hochstadt
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Suzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews
46W–65L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.