Teams

Port Royal Players

Adult Team Tennis · 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Colin Hawkins
published 4.5
3.95
Albert Day
published 4
3.87
Royston Tedder
published
3.81
James Diaz
published
3.69
3.60
Terri Chaney
published
3.59
Anne Finn
published 4
3.58
Jennifer Hewett
published
3.54
Richard Schwartz
published
3.52
Nadya Caminos
published
3.46
Lee Varner
published
3.40
George Knoske
published
3.35
Arthur Patterson
published 3.5
3.34
Nelly Choy
published
3.32
Charles Bond
published 3.5
3.31
Kyoko Queen
published
3.31
Nikki Dershaw
published
3.19
Dawn Richard
published 3.5
3.18
CAROLYN DALE
published 3.5
3.12
Dawn Burke
published 3.5
3.08
Everett Dwyer
published
3.05
Brad Dershaw
published 3.5
Joseph Curcio
published
Scott Vogel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Everett Dwyer + Richard Schwartz4357% gamesnot enough data
James Diaz + Albert Day404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Willow Cooper + Nelly Choy303 matchesnot enough data
Nelly Choy + Dawn Burke123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colin Hawkins
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Albert Day
91W–43L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
Royston Tedder
43W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
James Diaz
55W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Amy Willow Cooper
100W–54L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Terri Chaney
35W–35L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Anne Finn
30W–33L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.59
Jennifer Hewett
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Richard Schwartz
32W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Nadya Caminos
45W–14L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lee Varner
44W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
George Knoske
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Arthur Patterson
60W–39L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Nelly Choy
53W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Charles Bond
32W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Kyoko Queen
17W–25L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.31
Nikki Dershaw
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Dawn Richard
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
CAROLYN DALE
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Dawn Burke
26W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
Everett Dwyer
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Brad Dershaw
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Joseph Curcio
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Vogel
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.