Teams

LLTC - Sets in the City

2023 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Tuesday · 4.0 Ladies Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 3.71 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-04vs Lakeside CC - Hustle and ShineLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Hang / Simran Khadka vs Elizabeth Dillingham / Julia Gast2-6, 2-6
2023-03-28vs Lifetime Galleria - Uptown GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Hang / Simran Khadka vs Jaree Lee / Christina Hadjioannou6-1, 6-2
2023-03-01vs LLTC - Double VisionWon 10
W#3 DoublesSimran Khadka / Angelina Proudfoot vs Dema Diaz / Grace Simpson6-4, 6-1
2023-02-28vs LLTC - Double VisionWon 10
W#2 DoublesSimran Khadka / Lillian Lam vs Joyce Garza / Grace Shi6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberly Hang / Simran Khadka vs Lindsey Bradford / Marsha Haltom6-4, 6-4
2023-02-14vs Lifetime Galleria - Uptown GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoyce Wang / Simran Khadka vs Jimena Gilabert / Holly Peery2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Basia Walters
published 4
3.90
Joyce Wang
published
3.87
Simran Khadka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Mary Le
published
3.77
Kimberly Hang
published
Amanda Malinoff
published 4
3.58
Giang Dinh
published 3.5
3.50
Lillian Lam
published
3.28
3.27
Angelina Proudfoot
published 3.5
Danica Nguyen
published 3.5
Diem Pham
published 3.5
KHEKIE CHANTHANARK
published
Katy Balli
published
Kylie Sullivan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Basia Walters
30W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
4.10
Joyce Wang
45W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Simran Khadka
62W–91L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.87
Mary Le
31W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Kimberly Hang
34W–28L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Amanda Malinoff
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Giang Dinh
54W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.58
Lillian Lam
40W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
LaShonda Nacole Pentecost
34W–49L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Angelina Proudfoot
40W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danica Nguyen
7W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Diem Pham
57W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
KHEKIE CHANTHANARK
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katy Balli
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kylie Sullivan
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Potisek Lee
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.