Teams

MacAttack 55

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 55 & Over Day · Adult 55 & Over Day Women 7.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-08-25vs ProlaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie Richards / Laura Haney vs Shelly Chamness / Kathryn Poehler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Johnson / Karen Spano vs Susan Groman / Kim Ziegler4-6, 3-6
2021-08-24vs Make a RacketWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Julia Johnson vs Mary Klett / Diana Engler7-5, 6-0
2021-08-18vs ProlaWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Richards / Laura Haney vs Marian Boring / Pamela Leffler6-2, 6-2
2021-08-09vs GrubeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeresa McTeague / Debra MacDonald vs Nancy Trimble / Arlene Kitahara0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Greenberg / Laura Haney vs Cheryl Cook-Auerbach / Linda Shojaei7-5, 6-2
2021-08-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Laura Haney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEsther Wang / Karen Spano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-01vs SparksWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Spano / Debra MacDonald vs Lisa Paulman / Jean Schaffer6-3, 6-2
2021-07-23vs ShipleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa McTeague / Laura Haney vs Elizabeth Goldy / Patricia Murphy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Julia Johnson vs Denise Berger / Lynne Collman6-0, 6-1
2021-07-11vs GrubeWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Debra MacDonald vs Bonnie Bernard / Dawn Collins6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-26vs SparksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie Richards / Laura Haney vs Brenda Crowe / Jean Schaffer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Konecke / Karen Spano vs Debbie Drown / Jeanne Celtnieks1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over Day Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Laura Haney
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Debra MacDonald
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Esther Wang
published 3.5
2.88
Karen Spano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Haney + Debra MacDonald241455% games−2.3% vs expected
Karen Spano + Debra MacDonald2551% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Debra MacDonald
213W–223L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Esther Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Karen Spano
88W–120L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.