Teams

Dahl: Slice Girls

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-25vs Londer/Goldfine: OverservedWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Meyer / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Pamela Londer / Sara Goldfine6-2, 7-6
2024-07-18vs Stordahl Kickin AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKeela Cottew / Catherine Hosamane vs Monica Hoffmann / Kelly Stordahl6-2, 6-3
2024-06-27vs Baisch/HansenLost 01
L#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Karen Dewing4-6, 5-7
2024-06-20vs Rabago-Macariola: Tough LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Kelly Meyer vs Corazon Fos / KJ Madison6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Claudia Chapman6-3, 6-3
2024-06-13vs Londer/Goldfine: OverservedWon 20
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Allison Perry3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Dahl / Aleksandra Fermstad vs Julie Gainsley / Susan Greenberg6-3, 6-3
2024-06-06vs Stordahl Kickin AcesWon 10
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hosamane vs Monica Hoffmann7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-23vs Baisch/HansenWon 10
W#2 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Julie Dahl vs Ellen Boss Krohn / Karen Jacobson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-16vs Rabago-Macariola: Tough LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesAleksandra Fermstad / Kelly Meyer vs Maria Cecilia Ray / Marie Stodolka6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Keela Cottew
published
3.16
Catherine Hosamane
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Gina Collins
published
3.01
Su Ann DeGeorgeo
published
2.92
Aleksandra Fermstad
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Lisa Timek
published
2.71
Karen Hamm
published
2.66
Leeza Scheglowski
published
Linda Hauser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Collins + Su Ann DeGeorgeo5071% games+11.2% vs expected
Aleksandra Fermstad + Lisa Timek4259% games+1.1% vs expected
Catherine Hosamane + Aleksandra Fermstad7162% games+0.0% vs expected
Aleksandra Fermstad + Gina Collins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keela Cottew
18W–33L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Catherine Hosamane
163W–105L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Gina Collins
25W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
Su Ann DeGeorgeo
30W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Aleksandra Fermstad
117W–53L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lisa Timek
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Karen Hamm
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Elizabeth Christensen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Leeza Scheglowski
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Hauser
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.