Teams

Zumwalt - Mazarick

2024 Sandhills Summer Singles Adult 18 & over · 3.0 Adult Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-04vs Lee - CCNCWon 10
W#2 SinglesHeather Sisk vs Meagan Lee6-4, 7-5
2024-09-04vs Lee - CCNCLost 01
L#2 SinglesLydia Apollo vs Caroline Parks1-6, 6-7
2024-09-03vs Lee - CCNCWon 10
W#2 SinglesHeather Sisk vs Hayes Lemons6-3, 6-4
2024-08-27vs Lee - CCNCWon 30
W#1 SinglesLindsay Sarff vs Maria Fulcher6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesYuko Resseguie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLydia Apollo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-30vs Lee - CCNCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLindsay Sarff vs Teresa Pearce6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesLydia Apollo vs Caroline Parks6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-25vs Lee - CCNCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTanya Sistare vs Ellen Frazer2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHeather Sisk vs Teresa Pearce6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lindsay Sarff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Yuko Resseguie
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Tanya Sistare
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Ericka Zumwalt
published 3
2.89
Samantha Zumwalt
published
2.77
Lydia Apollo
usually #3 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.68
Heather Sisk
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Karla Bullon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Sistare + Ericka Zumwalt261257% games+3.0% vs expected
Ericka Zumwalt + Yuko Resseguie4853% gamesnot enough data
Heather Sisk + Lydia Apollo5555% gamesnot enough data
Ericka Zumwalt + Lydia Apollo3551% gamesnot enough data
Lydia Apollo + Yuko Resseguie4356% gamesnot enough data
Heather Sisk + Yuko Resseguie314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lindsay Sarff
71W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Yuko Resseguie
128W–134L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Tanya Sistare
87W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3
Ericka Zumwalt
94W–73L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
Samantha Zumwalt
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Lydia Apollo
71W–82L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Heather Sisk
51W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.68
Karla Bullon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.