Teams

Safety Harbor Pasinski

2022 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 8.0 MXD Sunday

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-19vs YMCA PerryWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Hollingsworth / Natalia Illich vs Andy Svenson / Deborah Golomb6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-12vs SPTC Holliday 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesGary Zirbel / Natalia Illich vs Nash Dean / Andrea Fajardo6-4, 7-6
2022-06-05vs Seminole Lake TimminsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Zirbel / Natalia Illich vs Kevin Burnett / Diana Zarreke6-2, 6-3
2022-04-24vs Seminole Lake RamdeenWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Zirbel / Natalia Illich vs Brian Hodapp / Allison Guerra6-4, 6-2
2022-04-10vs PINELLAS - Tarpon/KronkWon 10
W#3 DoublesNatalia Illich / Christopher Hollingsworth vs Erik Breitenbach / Kathleen Stein6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Kayla Dyer
published
4.17
Ray Pasinski
published
4.14
Olivia Rivas
published
3.76
Christopher Hollingsworth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
Brad Armagost
published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.74
Cindy Swartz
published 4
3.69
Natalia Illich
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.21
Rachel Karioki
published
Lisa Hueholt
published
Stutti Smit-Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalia Illich + Christopher Hollingsworth10653% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kayla Dyer
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Ray Pasinski
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Olivia Rivas
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Christopher Hollingsworth
141W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cindy Swartz
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Natalia Illich
80W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Rachel Karioki
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Lisa Hueholt
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stutti Smit-Johnson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.