Teams

SS-G RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs PH REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesSunil Bheemireddy / Rick Blankenship vs Richard Wright / Rob Deevy6-3, 6-1
2023-05-24vs KC-CC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesSunil Bheemireddy / Jeff Miller vs Roger Bowers / Ken Reed4-6, 3-6
2023-05-17vs BVP GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesRick Blankenship / Sunil Bheemireddy vs Mike Bennett / Tony Schwartz6-2, 6-1
2023-05-14vs BM ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Miller / Rick Blankenship vs Christopher Hill / Mitchell McGregor6-2, 6-4
2023-05-03vs MC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesVincent Gonzales / Rick Blankenship vs David Clark / Larry Middle3-6, 1-3
2023-04-26vs KC-CC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesSunil Bheemireddy / Jeff Miller vs Brent Johnson / Terry Egert6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Blankenship / Vincent Gonzales vs Gerard Conroy / Gary Anderson6-4, 6-2
2023-04-19vs LEBTC GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesSunil Bheemireddy / Rick Blankenship vs Edward Partlow / Richard Selim7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Mark Benson
published
3.81
Sunil Bheemireddy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Vincent Gonzales
published
Chris Gould
published 4
3.74
Rick Blankenship
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Joseph Gaiennie
published
3.67
Timothy Roberge
published
3.57
Harry Dorcy
published
3.55
Jerry Cerkovnik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vincent Gonzales + Sunil Bheemireddy7065% games+7.6% vs expected
Rick Blankenship + Sunil Bheemireddy301557% games+6.6% vs expected
Harry Dorcy + Jerry Cerkovnik3254% games+1.7% vs expected
Mark Benson + Harry Dorcy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Benson
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Sunil Bheemireddy
73W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Vincent Gonzales
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Chris Gould
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Rick Blankenship
68W–39L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
Joseph Gaiennie
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.73
Timothy Roberge
16W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
Harry Dorcy
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Jerry Cerkovnik
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.