Teams

R&J - Team D

2024 Yadkin Valley Racquets and Jackets · Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-01-26vs R&J - Team ALost 02
L#1 DoublesFelice Manget Harvey / Alisha Baity vs Nancy Hart / Jennifer Pardee4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Soriano / Mariela Arias vs Sarah Kaplan / Claire Devon0-6, 2-6
2025-01-13vs R&J - Team BLost 01
L#1 DoublesSamantha Talbott / Felice Manget Harvey vs Amy Backus / Amy Braden3-6, 5-7
2025-01-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesMariela Arias / Christina Soriano vs Amy Mills / Laura Harvey6-0, 7-5
2024-12-21vs R&J - Team ALost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Soriano / Felice Manget Harvey vs Claire Devon / Colleen Isaacson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Talbott / Olivia Calisi vs Donna Johnson / Nancy Hart3-6, 4-6
2024-12-14vs R&J - Team BWon 10
W#1 DoublesSamantha Talbott / Alisha Baity vs Nora Ferrell / Amy Braden6-2, 7-5
2024-12-07vs R&J - Team CLost 02
L#1 DoublesFelice Manget Harvey / Christina Soriano vs JoAnn White / Laura Harvey1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMariela Arias / Olivia Calisi vs Amy Mills / Hannah Giles2-6, 2-6
2024-11-23vs R&J - Team ALost 02
L#1 DoublesAlisha Baity / Christina Soriano vs Sarah Kaplan / Colleen Isaacson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMariela Arias / Samantha Talbott vs Jennifer Pardee / Donna Johnson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-09vs R&J - Team CLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariela Arias / Samantha Talbott vs Hannah Giles / Julie Long3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Felice Manget Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Samantha Talbott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Christina Soriano
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Alisha Baity
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mariela Arias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Olivia Calisi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Soriano + Samantha Talbott213 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Talbott + Mariela Arias033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Felice Manget Harvey
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Samantha Talbott
36W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Christina Soriano
28W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.85
3
Alisha Baity
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariela Arias
4W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Calisi
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.