Teams

Lovell/FS/CM

2024 Fall Into Winter Doubles · 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-13vs Mullens/VB/VBTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Jenkins / Cristy Harp vs Joanna Ayala / Blanca Barroso2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Forsgren / Heather Vaughn vs Wendy Mullens / Becke Symonds6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Lovell / Teresa Williams vs Kara Adams / Nancy Kremers0-6, 2-6
2024-11-06vs Mullens/VB/VBTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Neidecker / Jessica Riggins vs Emma Robertson / Joanna Ayala6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Lovell / Carrie Medlyn vs Blanca Barroso / Wendy Mullens6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Forsgren / Heather Vaughn vs Kristi Hudson / Elizabeth Canas7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Jennifer Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lacey Kennon
published
2.65
Teresa Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Stephanie Neidecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Jessica Riggins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Lori Forsgren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Cristy Harp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Carrie Medlyn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Maria Lovell
published
Savannah Lopez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Neidecker + Lori Forsgren134 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Riggins + Carrie Medlyn123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Neidecker + Cristy Harp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Jenkins
27W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Lacey Kennon
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Teresa Williams
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Stephanie Neidecker
17W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Jessica Riggins
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.59
Lori Forsgren
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Cristy Harp
23W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Carrie Medlyn
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.47
Maria Lovell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Savannah Lopez
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.