Teams

WMaxwell-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Mary T Long
published
2.67
Sophia Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Cara Fong
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Xinwen Zhang
published
2.21
Leigh Edmonson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Sophia Anderson
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Cara Fong
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Xinwen Zhang
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Leigh Edmonson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.