Teams

EW-PFC-Rudy

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spokane · 3.0 WOMEN Spokane

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-28vs Peak-CattellWon 30
W#1 DoublesLilia Kondo / Voni Tombari vs Lilly Berlett / Christine Cattell2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPaula Siok vs Jandi Stowell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Rudy / Alexis Moore vs MaryLynn Dodd / Laura Bragg6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-06vs SRC You LaterSplit 11
W#2 DoublesVoni Tombari / Lilia Kondo vs Suzanne Griffin-Lawson / Jennifer Nelson6-0, 7-6
L#2 SinglesPaula Siok vs Heather Pina0-6, 5-7
2026-03-01vs SRC-Net Working WomenWon 20
W#1 SinglesPaula Siok vs Stefanie Hunsaker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLilia Kondo / Voni Tombari vs Annika Bair / Natalie Curtin6-3, 6-4
2026-02-07vs Peak-CattellSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlexis Moore vs Dianne Parcher6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesVoni Tombari / Lilia Kondo vs Nancy Hughes / Cheryl Stransky6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2026-01-31vs SRC-Net Working WomenWon 10
W#2 SinglesAlexis Moore vs Stefanie Hunsaker6-2, 6-2
2026-01-25vs SRC You LaterWon 10
W#2 SinglesPaula Siok vs Annelisa Riddle6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN Spokane have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Alexis Moore
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.96
Alyson Gamache
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.94
Michelle Burgess
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
Paula Siok
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Stefanie Collins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.81
Voni Tombari
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Caitlin Yahne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Shirlee Steiner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Susan Busch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Marie Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Heidi Rudy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Lilia Kondo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.48
Anne Vogel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Pamela Farley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lilia Kondo + Voni Tombari6259% games+9.6% vs expected
Shirlee Steiner + Voni Tombari8753% games+0.0% vs expected
Michelle Burgess + Susan Busch1741% games−5.5% vs expected
Pamela Farley + Anne Vogel1729% games−10.8% vs expected
Michelle Burgess + Shirlee Steiner4451% games−13.2% vs expected
Michelle Burgess + Heidi Rudy044 matchesnot enough data
Anne Vogel + Paula Siok044 matchesnot enough data
Marie Lambert + Shirlee Steiner224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexis Moore
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
3
Alyson Gamache
28W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Michelle Burgess
16W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Paula Siok
19W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Stefanie Collins
26W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Voni Tombari
75W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Caitlin Yahne
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Shirlee Steiner
59W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Susan Busch
43W–65L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Marie Lambert
73W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Heidi Rudy
12W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.61
Lilia Kondo
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Anne Vogel
5W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Pamela Farley
27W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.