Teams

Halo Halo

2022 Mixed 55 and Over Weekends · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WEST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-27vs AlohaLost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Borns / Shauna Miller vs Albert Murata / Michelle Johnson6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErrol Llantos / Lovette Llantos vs Rance Tobara / Joni Izumi-Nakamoto6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStan Kaneo / Fletcher Olson vs Jason Izumi / Cynthia Vezina6-4, 6-3
2022-11-26vs AlohaWon 21
L#1 DoublesShauna Miller / Edward Allen vs Michelle Johnson / Albert Murata2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLovette Llantos / Errol Llantos vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Rance Tobara6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFletcher Olson / Stan Kaneo vs Cynthia Vezina / Jason Izumi6-1, 6-4
2022-11-20vs AlohaLost 02
L#1 DoublesBob Borns / Fletcher Olson vs Rance Tobara / Joni Izumi-Nakamoto6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJack Starks / Shauna Miller vs Albert Murata / Michelle Johnson0-6, 6-7
2022-11-20vs AlohaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLovette Llantos / Bob Borns vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Rance Tobara1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFletcher Olson / Jack Starks vs Michelle Johnson / Albert Murata5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErrol Llantos / Laurie Jo Rogers vs Cynthia Vezina / Jason Izumi7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aloha317513116
2Halo Halo135715105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Bob Borns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Shauna Miller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jack Starks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Errol Llantos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Fletcher Olson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Lovette Llantos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Edward Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Jo Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stan Kaneo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Errol Llantos + Lovette Llantos5453% gamesnot enough data
Lovette Llantos + Bob Borns5247% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bob Borns
55W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Shauna Miller
66W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Jack Starks
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Errol Llantos
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Fletcher Olson
58W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lovette Llantos
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Edward Allen
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Jo Rogers
29W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Stan Kaneo
28W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.