Teams

Black- HRC

2024 Pine Belt Singles League · 4.0+ Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.12 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs Rodgers 4.0 singlesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarrie Olsson vs Katie Reid0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDanielle Black vs Karol St Louis6-4, 6-1
2024-12-03vs Rodgers 4.0 singlesWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmy Batson vs Karol St Louis7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesKeri Galey vs Ashley Davidson7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDanielle Black vs Beth Rodgers7-6, 6-4
2024-11-27vs Rodgers 4.0 singlesWon 20
W#1 SinglesTiffany Lawrence vs Karol St Louis6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDanielle Black vs Beth Rodgers6-4, 7-6
2024-11-20vs Rodgers 4.0 singlesWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmy Batson vs Ashley Davidson6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKeri Galey vs Allison Mayers7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDanielle Black vs Courtney Gianola6-3, 6-2
2024-11-05vs Rodgers 4.0 singlesWon 21
L#1 SinglesTiffany Lawrence vs Katie Reid2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKeri Galey vs Allison Mayers6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesElizabeth Asmar vs Beth Rodgers6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-29vs Rodgers 4.0 singlesLost 12
L#1 SinglesCarrie Olsson vs Allison Mayers6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKeri Galey vs Beth Rodgers6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Asmar vs Renee Dozier7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0+ Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Black- HRC4212614156
2Rodgers 4.0 singles2461227179

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Batson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.71
Carrie Olsson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Danielle Black
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.69
Elizabeth Asmar
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Keri Galey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Tiffany Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Asmar + Danielle Black4253% games+4.5% vs expected
Carrie Olsson + Elizabeth Asmar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Batson
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Carrie Olsson
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Danielle Black
46W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Elizabeth Asmar
21W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Keri Galey
22W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
Tiffany Lawrence
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.