Teams

Racquet Rebels

Adult 18 & Over Fall · 2.5 Women Shore

15 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-21vs Court QueensLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Lunanuova / Suzanne Greco vs Patricia Anne Lucas / linda noto0-6, 6-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSandy Hsyu vs SOPHIA van MOL4-6, 6-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGail Gordon / Jill Pesciotta vs Susan Lucchesi / Erica Sprague7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-14vs Court QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiana Russillo / Gail Gordon vs Susan Lucchesi / Laura Turek6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJocelyn Carney vs SOPHIA van MOL7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarcia Anderson / Sharon Coleman vs Jacqueline Mason / Erica Sprague1-6, 0-6
2025-10-24vs Court QueensWon 30
W#1 DoublesGail Gordon / Jill Pesciotta vs Jacqueline Mason / linda noto7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSandy Hsyu vs Lina Villani6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Russillo / Olga Kadan vs Olinda Fuda / Laura Turek7-6, 3-5, 1-0
2025-10-17vs Court QueensLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Russillo / Kristin Lunanuova vs Jacqueline Mason / linda noto3-6, 4-5
L#1 SinglesOlga Kadan vs SOPHIA van MOL0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFrancesca Matassa / Jessica Valvo vs Viet Nguyen / Lina Villani7-6, 5-3
2025-10-10vs Court QueensWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandy Hsyu / Suzanne Greco vs Jacqueline Mason / SOPHIA van MOL5-7, 4-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJocelyn Carney vs Brindha Kodlapur5-7, 4-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Russillo / Kristin Lunanuova vs Viet Nguyen / Sharon Fiore6-4, 3-4, 1-0
2025-10-03vs Court QueensLost 03
L#1 DoublesJocelyn Carney / Francesca Matassa vs Susan Lucchesi / Laura Turek4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVictoria Bowley vs SOPHIA van MOL0-6, 6-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Pesciotta / Lindsay Lent vs Suzanne Donlan / Erica Sprague2-6, 5-7
2025-09-26vs Court QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesGail Gordon / Jessica Valvo vs Patricia Anne Lucas / linda noto6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesOlga Kadan vs Shruti Kumari Panwar6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLindsay Lent / Marcia Anderson vs Suzanne Donlan / Lina Villani2-6, 6-5, 0-1
2025-09-19vs Court QueensLost 12
L#1 DoublesVictoria Bowley / Sandy Hsyu vs linda noto / Laura Turek2-6, 3-5
L#1 SinglesDiana Russillo vs Brindha Kodlapur1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Greco / Olga Kadan vs Olinda Fuda / Deborah Adams6-4, 6-2
2025-09-12vs Court QueensLost 03
L#1 DoublesSharon Coleman / Suzanne Greco vs Susan Lucchesi / Viet Nguyen4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Hsyu vs Brindha Kodlapur1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Russillo / Kristin Lunanuova vs Jacqueline Mason / Erica Sprague3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Shore have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Jocelyn Carney
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Sandy Hsyu
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Kristin Lunanuova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Candyce Sullivan
published 2.5
2.37
Suzanne Greco
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Gail Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.27
Jessica Valvo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Diana Russillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.21
Sharon Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.20
Francesca Matassa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.14
Lindsay Lent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Olga Kadan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.01
Marcia Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Jill Pesciotta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Victoria Bowley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Russillo + Kristin Lunanuova2447% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Lunanuova + Jocelyn Carney4263% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Hsyu + Victoria Bowley213 matchesnot enough data
Gail Gordon + Candyce Sullivan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jocelyn Carney
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%46%54%
2.51
Sandy Hsyu
13W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
Kristin Lunanuova
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Candyce Sullivan
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
Suzanne Greco
18W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Gail Gordon
7W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Jessica Valvo
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Diana Russillo
9W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Sharon Coleman
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
3
Francesca Matassa
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.20
Lindsay Lent
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Olga Kadan
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Marcia Anderson
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Jill Pesciotta
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Victoria Bowley
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.