Teams

Wellman

2021 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jin Velasco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Suzanne Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Maryam Farinola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2021-08-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Maryam Farinola vs Janet Lee / Lia Irvin7-6, 6-3
2021-08-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Chambers / Jin Velasco vs Suzie Glenn / Michele Snyder6-3, 7-6
2021-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Chambers / Maryam Farinola vs Chanon Ogden / Gina Meyer6-4, 6-0
2021-07-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Jin Velasco vs Helen Chen / Shoully Mendyke6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2021-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesJin Velasco / Maryam Farinola vs Kari Hastings / Jennifer Lucas6-4, 6-1
2021-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesJin Velasco / Maryam Farinola vs Lana Lane / Kathy Ramsey7-6, 6-2
2021-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaie Wellman / Suzanne Chambers vs Mary Green-Zwemke / Anita Rockwell6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jin Velasco
69W–35L career
6%91%4%
3.75
3.5
Suzanne Chambers
80W–68L career
0%98%2%
3.31
3.5
Maryam Farinola
55W–59L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.