Teams

Volley Girls

2023 Baltimore Adult 40 & Over · Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-26vs No Strings AttachedWon 21
L#1 SinglesLaura Delozier vs Christine Hammann1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rauhofer / Margaret Grow-Sadler vs Sheri Mazurkevich / Laura Garcia6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Aimee MacEda vs Patrice Holtz / Carol Fitzpatrick6-2, 7-5
2023-07-24vs No Strings AttachedWon 20
W#1 DoublesMartha Whitty / Ginny Spivey vs Christine Hammann / Colleen Begg6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMelinda Capone / Lena Brandenburg vs Ronni Wexler / Leigh Williams6-4, 6-2
2023-07-22vs No Strings AttachedSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLaura Delozier vs Christine Hammann4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / Michelle Tyde vs Sheri Mazurkevich / Laura Garcia4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-20vs No Strings AttachedWon 20
W#2 DoublesMELODY KELLY / Michelle Tyde vs Laura Garcia / Michele Brill6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCaroline Wolven / Aimee MacEda vs Irma Purisch / Bernadette Burger6-2, 6-4
2023-07-18vs No Strings AttachedWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Whitty / MELODY KELLY vs Christine Hammann / Michele Brill6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDianna Sinofsky vs Keyonna Baker0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Wolven / Heather Nesti vs Karen Vaughan / Sheri Mazurkevich7-5, 6-1
2023-07-13vs No Strings AttachedWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Delozier / Lena Brandenburg vs Irma Purisch / Leigh Williams6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesHeather Nesti vs Keyonna Baker2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret Grow-Sadler / Shannon Biggs vs Colleen Begg / Sheri Mazurkevich6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Tyde / Aimee MacEda vs Patrice Holtz / Gail Lawson6-2, 6-0
2023-07-11vs No Strings AttachedLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Whitty / Lynn Chincheck vs Colleen Begg / Karen Vaughan4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLaura Delozier vs Christine Hammann6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDianna Sinofsky / AnneMarie Schoenwetter vs Michele Brill / Laura Garcia3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-08Split 11
L#2 DoublesMichelle Tyde / Melinda Capone vs Michele Brill / Laura Garcia7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Grow-Sadler / AnneMarie Schoenwetter vs Karen Vaughan / Leigh Williams6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Lena Brandenburg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.14
Heather Nesti
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Laura Delozier
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Martha Whitty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Caroline Wolven
published 3
2.77
Dianna Sinofsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Shannon Biggs
published
2.74
Margaret Grow-Sadler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Aimee MacEda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Leigh Tobin
published
2.67
Lynn Chincheck
published
2.59
Michelle Tyde
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianna Sinofsky + Aimee MacEda8355% games+2.0% vs expected
Michelle Tyde + Dianna Sinofsky8751% games−16.2% vs expected
Michelle Tyde + Aimee MacEda5356% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Tyde + Heather Nesti3351% gamesnot enough data
Heather Nesti + Aimee MacEda224 matchesnot enough data
Martha Whitty + Laura Delozier044 matchesnot enough data
Heather Nesti + Dianna Sinofsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lena Brandenburg
93W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%10%90%
3.16
3
Heather Nesti
180W–165L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Laura Delozier
31W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Martha Whitty
64W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Caroline Wolven
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Dianna Sinofsky
43W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Shannon Biggs
18W–30L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Margaret Grow-Sadler
40W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Aimee MacEda
27W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Leigh Tobin
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Lynn Chincheck
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Michelle Tyde
39W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.