Teams

Yadkin/Kulits/18 3.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Men 3.5 - Monday Night

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-28vs Yadkin/Paukner/18 3.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesDrew Gerstmyer vs Lyle Paukner6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Adam McCord6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTL Brown vs Greg Oppenheim2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-21vs Yadkin/Acker/18 3.5Split 11
W#2 SinglesDrew Gerstmyer vs Matt Craver6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTL Brown vs Timothy Wyatt6-7, 6-7
2025-07-14vs Yadkin/Whitman 18+ 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Alexandre Guevel6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJoseph Kulits vs Tj Buckley6-2, 6-4
2025-07-07vs Yadkin/Paukner/18 3.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Adam McCord6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDrew Gerstmyer vs Greg Oppenheim6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTL Brown vs Chase Webb6-2, 6-0
2025-06-30vs Yadkin/Acker/18 3.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesJoseph Kulits vs Matt Crews6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDrew Gerstmyer vs Alex Djuro6-0, 6-4
2025-06-23vs Yadkin/Whitman 18+ 3.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesJoseph Kulits vs Alexandre Guevel2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTL Brown vs Tory Wagoner6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Tj Buckley6-2, 6-0
2025-06-16vs Yadkin/Paukner/18 3.5 SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesJoseph Kulits vs Vance Faulkner6-4, 6-3
2025-06-09vs Yadkin/Acker/18 3.5Split 11
L#2 SinglesTL Brown vs Alex Djuro1-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Timothy Wyatt6-1, 7-5
2025-06-02vs Yadkin/Whitman 18+ 3.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJoseph Kulits vs Alexandre Guevel4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLogan Caldwell vs Tj Buckley6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNeil Bishop vs Nathan Ayers7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 - Monday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Joseph Kulits
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.50
Logan Caldwell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.36
Drew Gerstmyer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.23
Andrew Darcy
published 3.5
Neil Bishop
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
TL Brown
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Kulits
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Logan Caldwell
29W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Drew Gerstmyer
10W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Andrew Darcy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Neil Bishop
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
TL Brown
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.