Teams

Buckhorn Racket Scientists - C. Guido

2026 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-23vs HCC 55 and So Good - D. McKnightWon 21
L#1 DoublesSherri Bornstine / Sheryl Schumacher vs Sally Farkas / Dawn McKnight2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDionesia Ibanez / Angie Mudge vs Roswita Buss-Lindekeit / Melinda Hart4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Pam Smith vs Melissa Voelker / Melissa Wolfe7-5, 6-4
2026-03-07vs AG LOCAs - G. BurkeLost 12
W#1 DoublesSherri Bornstine / Anne Wooley vs Heidi Milan / Sylvie Roy6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPam Smith / Tammy Hohman vs Silvia Srour / Beth Hart2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Sheryl Schumacher vs Tracey Tupler / Elaine Jones6-7, 2-6
2026-02-28vs Hunters Green - E. VickersLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Pam Smith vs Catherine Nivens / Danna Sturman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-21vs HILLS/Adult55&over7.0W/ W. LiLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherri Bornstine / Dionesia Ibanez vs Emiliya Cogdill / Min Long1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarol Guido / Sheryl Schumacher vs Ileana Figueroa / Fan Wang6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTammy Hohman / Angie Mudge vs Dong Li / Hong Liu6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs HCC 55 and So Good - D. McKnightLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Flynn / Sherri Bornstine vs Kathy Skonieczny / Tobey Hartigan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSheryl Schumacher / Ginger Anzalone vs Dawn McKnight / Melinda Hart6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Pam Smith vs Roswita Buss-Lindekeit / Melissa Wolfe2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-31vs AG LOCAs - G. BurkeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAurora Finucane / Sheryl Schumacher vs Sylvie Roy / Heidi Milan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole Evans / Dionesia Ibanez vs Beth Hart / Silvia Srour6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Anne Wooley vs Geri Burke / Lisa Strickland6-7, 1-6
2026-01-24vs Hunters Green - E. VickersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSherri Bornstine / Elaine Deval vs Debbie Beckwith / Kristen Pierce2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Pam Smith vs Ann Coston / Catherine Nivens3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-01-17vs HILLS/Adult55&over7.0W/ W. LiLost 12
L#1 DoublesAurora Finucane / Sherri Bornstine vs Fan Wang / Min Long2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesNicole Evans / Dionesia Ibanez vs Margarita Colon / Connie Wang4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Guido / Elaine Deval vs Wenhong Li / Xue Chan3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Anne Wooley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Sherri Bornstine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Aurora Finucane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Dionesia Ibanez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Tammy Hohman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Elaine Deval
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Carol Guido
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.14
Mary Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Sheryl Schumacher
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Ginger Anzalone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Pam Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Angie Mudge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Smith + Tammy Hohman8749% games−1.8% vs expected
Angie Mudge + Sherri Bornstine31038% games−6.6% vs expected
Tammy Hohman + Carol Guido3654% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Schumacher + Carol Guido4347% gamesnot enough data
Carol Guido + Sherri Bornstine2443% gamesnot enough data
Aurora Finucane + Carol Guido3249% gamesnot enough data
Angie Mudge + Carol Guido044 matchesnot enough data
Sheryl Schumacher + Sherri Bornstine134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Wooley
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Sherri Bornstine
88W–131L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Aurora Finucane
28W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Dionesia Ibanez
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Tammy Hohman
77W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Elaine Deval
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–215L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Mary Flynn
8W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Sheryl Schumacher
112W–104L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.10
Ginger Anzalone
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Pam Smith
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Angie Mudge
49W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.