Teams

MC GREEN

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-04-20vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#1 SinglesTina Atchley vs Nicole Cotta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-13vs BP REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dolin / Leigh Goerke vs JJ Wagner / Erin Heltshe3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKay Newman / Claudia Perales vs Lisa Hoogendoorn Daniel / Emily Adams4-6, 3-6
2024-04-06vs RHCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesCasey Tatum / Tina Atchley vs Jody Alderman / Maria Lucas1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Goerke vs Mindi Pearse2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Perales / Meegan Miloud vs Jue Abrahamson / Carla Grumann3-6, 6-7
2024-03-30vs NJ PINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Atchley / Rebecca BaanHofman vs Mary Shugrue / Meredith Beveridge2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeegan Miloud / Kay Newman vs Jill Orsatti / Joni Roberts3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Leigh Goerke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Claudia Perales
published 3
2.90
Michelle Dolin
published
2.88
Tina Atchley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Rebecca BaanHofman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Casey Tatum
published 3
2.63
Jane Harmon
published
2.52
Meegan Miloud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Kay Newman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Goerke + Michelle Dolin5158% games+6.3% vs expected
Tina Atchley + Rebecca BaanHofman593157% games+3.0% vs expected
Casey Tatum + Meegan Miloud1441% games−2.0% vs expected
Kay Newman + Meegan Miloud111248% games−7.2% vs expected
Kay Newman + Rebecca BaanHofman4162% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Goerke + Meegan Miloud314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Leigh Goerke
80W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Claudia Perales
22W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Michelle Dolin
27W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Tina Atchley
148W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Rebecca BaanHofman
94W–76L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Casey Tatum
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
Jane Harmon
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Meegan Miloud
44W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Kay Newman
73W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.