Teams

High Rollers

2023 Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over · Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.79 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-12vs Rush The NetWon 10
W#2 DoublesTuan Pham / Sharon Sabasteanski vs Jennifer Gick / Dante Paragas6-2, 6-1
2023-05-07vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Todd / Nancy Sicairos vs Mia Montanez / Tusar Chhotaray6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-02vs Rush The NetWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaith Peter / Wendy Beale vs Lisa Puzzuoli / Rohit Munjal3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesEyad Abuhamda / Wendy Beale vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Beale / Eyad Abuhamda vs Jennifer Fox / Mark Fox6-3, 6-2
2023-04-10vs Rush The NetWon 10
W#2 DoublesVI Huynh / Sharon Sabasteanski vs Melinda Capitano / Won So6-3, 6-1
2023-04-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesTuan Pham / Nancy Sicairos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Erin Green
published
3.98
Nancy Sicairos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.86
David Todd
published 4
3.69
Eyad Abuhamda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Tuan Pham
published
3.53
Sawyer Warren
published
3.51
Yuan Zhang
published
3.47
Wendy Beale
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Susan Velasco
published
3.38
Sharon Sabasteanski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Erica Smedberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Alan Zhang
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Beale + Eyad Abuhamda5261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Green
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Nancy Sicairos
367W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
David Todd
58W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Eyad Abuhamda
141W–95L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Tuan Pham
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Sawyer Warren
24W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Yuan Zhang
47W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Wendy Beale
315W–200L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Susan Velasco
51W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Sharon Sabasteanski
255W–176L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Erica Smedberg
106W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Alan Zhang
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.