Teams

GR-Tribula (40s 8.5M C)

2025 Neuse River Combo 40 & Over · 40s 8.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-05vs OP-Baile (40s 8.5M C)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Matt Turbeville vs Joe Baile / Ross Blaylock3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Jonathan Tribula vs Ajay Loganadan / James Newman6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-14vs OP-Baile (40s 8.5M C)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Jeremy Jones vs Doug Lewis / James Newman6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStephen Reams / Robert Jones vs William Myer / Jeff Gravelin6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Jonathan Tribula vs Joe Baile / Graham Toler3-6, 3-6
2025-09-14vs OP-Baile (40s 8.5M C)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Robert Jones vs Joe Baile / Graham Toler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Jeremy Jones vs William Myer / Jeff Gravelin6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephen Reams / Jonathan Tribula vs Doug Lewis / James Newman5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-17vs OP-Baile (40s 8.5M C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Jeremy Jones vs William Myer / Aaron Yarus6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Robert Jones vs Joe Baile / Michael Alston7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephen Reams / Jonathan Tribula vs Doug Lewis / James Newman4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-17vs OP-Baile (40s 8.5M C)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesStephen Reams / Matt Turbeville vs William Myer / Aaron Yarus6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCourtney Harrell / Jeremy Jones vs Joe Baile / Michael Alston7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesQuincy Edwards / Robert Jones vs Graham Toler / James Newman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40s 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Courtney Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.90
Quincy Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.81
Stephen Reams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Jonathan Tribula
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Matt Turbeville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Quincy Edwards + Courtney Harrell134 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Reams + Courtney Harrell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Harrell
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Quincy Edwards
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
Stephen Reams
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.81
Jonathan Tribula
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Matt Turbeville
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.