← Teams

THPRD-Mounts/Rich

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Edmund Yuan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Clay Funkhouser
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Kirk Planck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Colin Looi
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Aaron Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Michael Rich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Jim Mounts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Jeff Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
George Scott
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
—
Jerry Garland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
—
Steve Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results8 ties
2021-11-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKirk Planck / Jeff Gonzales vs Dean Gaylor / Andy LaFrazia6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesClay Funkhouser / David Williams vs Ramon Tuason / Larry Liu6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Rich / Jerry Garland vs Boris Dimitrov / Mark Dawkins6-1, 6-1
2021-11-14Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJeff Gonzales / Steve Sanford vs Larry Liu / Andy LaFrazia7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJim Mounts / George Scott vs Everett Frank / Lee Wilcox6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAaron Bowman / David Williams vs Kurt Rylander / Ramon Tuason6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2021-11-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJeff Gonzales / Kirk Planck vs Martin Jeffrey Binns / Michael Stone6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesClay Funkhouser / Michael Rich vs Bob Lehman / Allen VanLeuven6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Williams / Jim Mounts vs Rick Davis / Michael Patrick6-0, 7-6
2021-10-31Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteve Sanford / Jeff Gonzales vs Dan Wendling / Scott Mayer6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesClay Funkhouser / David Williams vs David Swanson / William Neuhoff6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAaron Bowman / Jerry Garland vs David Visse / Pierre Burthey6-1, 6-1
2021-10-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Kirk Planck vs Stephen Mileham / Tony Humpage6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJerry Garland / Aaron Bowman vs Glenn Eisen / Jeffrey Bayless6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesClay Funkhouser / Michael Rich vs Fenn Bourland / Michael Delanty3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-10-10Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Kirk Planck vs Gary Townsend / Craig Mills6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClay Funkhouser / Michael Rich vs John Walsh / Dan Hostetler6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesColin Looi / David Williams vs Tony Moreno / Andy Pihl6-1, 6-2
2021-09-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJeff Gonzales / Kirk Planck vs John Walsh / Craig Mills6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Rich / Steve Sanford vs Tony Moreno / Andy Pihl6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAaron Bowman / George Scott vs Shirish Patel / Brian Noll6-4, 6-4
2021-09-17Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Steve Sanford vs Mark Becker / Randolph Splitter6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesColin Looi / Michael Rich vs Simon Lofts / Robin Michalisko6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJerry Garland / George Scott vs Alan Potts / Makoto Sakaguchi7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%96%4%
3.40
3.5
Clay Funkhouser
37W–53L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Kirk Planck
91W–71L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3
Colin Looi
91W–53L career
0%56%44%
3.08
3
Aaron Bowman
30W–58L career
0%93%7%
2.91
3
Michael Rich
45W–77L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%4%
2.87
3
Jeff Gonzales
19W–58L career
0%98%2%
2.83
3
George Scott
26W–78L career
35%65%0%
2.51
0
Jerry Garland
5W–18L career
not enough data
—
0
Steve Sanford
31W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.