Teams

GAC RED

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-05vs KNO BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMike Mooney / Erica Bruenton vs John Migliaccio / Elizabeth Baesman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Keirns / Lindsey Carpenter vs Tim Wilson / Corinne Flemister6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Kim / Amy Meadows vs Mark Thompson / Elizabeth Zenk6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-27vs GCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMike Mooney / Erica Bruenton vs Sean Raftery / Karen Raftery4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Habig / Cynthia Wessinger vs Ru Schanman / Gary Schanman6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDAVID SERAFIN / Lindsey Carpenter vs Bruce Scott / Andrea Karp6-1, 6-4
2021-06-20vs CM GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Mooney / Elaina Grauer vs Lea VanSchaack / Mark Melberg6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristopher Habig / Cynthia Wessinger vs Kristi Keil / Craig Ricketts6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Kim / Amy Meadows vs Paul Weissman / Romi Hovey7-6, 7-6
2021-06-13vs HG TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Keirns / Lindsey Carpenter vs Perry Kamel / Lisa Mullett6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher Habig / Cynthia Wessinger vs Marla Roper / Gary Capps6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRonald Stevens / Marli Davis vs Lisa Galop / Robert Galop6-1, 6-1
2021-06-06vs LTFC PURPLEWon 21
L#1 DoublesJay Sandstrom / Elaina Grauer vs Julie Garside / Jason Garside2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Keirns / Lindsey Carpenter vs Andy Silverman / Amy Silverman7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRonald Stevens / Marli Davis vs Lynn Price / Todd Price6-1, 6-2
2021-05-30vs KNO BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesRonald Stevens / Cynthia Wessinger vs Elizabeth Baesman / Eric Lownsberry7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Keirns / Lindsey Carpenter vs Corinne Flemister / Bruce Epler6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Mooney / Wendy Liu vs Mark Thompson / Kim Haverly3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-23vs GCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMike Mooney / Elaina Grauer vs Karen Raftery / Sean Raftery6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Keirns / Lindsey Carpenter vs Mark Dennis / Diane Matava6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDAVID SERAFIN / Cynthia Wessinger vs Allison Kaelberer / Mark Chase6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PCRK BLUE6117411152
2SSLGT BLUE6116513159
3GTC GOLD5214716177
4GTC GREEN34101125203
5SSH SILVER2571430225
6GAC RED2551635235
7MEA RED1651635234
8GTC RED1641736227

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Amy Meadows
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Cynthia Wessinger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.42
DAVID SERAFIN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Ronald Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Erica Bruenton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Elaina Grauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Jay Sandstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Michael Keirns
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Brenda Byrne
published 3
Christopher Habig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Marli Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mike Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Wessinger + Christopher Habig4167% games+9.0% vs expected
Lindsey Carpenter + Michael Keirns8159% games+5.5% vs expected
Elaina Grauer + Mike Mooney3256% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Wessinger + DAVID SERAFIN303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Meadows
44W–39L career · 2 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Cynthia Wessinger
94W–94L career · 5 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
DAVID SERAFIN
100W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
Ronald Stevens
38W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Erica Bruenton
40W–33L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elaina Grauer
143W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Jay Sandstrom
60W–83L career · 1 line in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Michael Keirns
46W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Brenda Byrne
79W–55L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
Christopher Habig
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindsey Carpenter
38W–19L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marli Davis
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Mooney
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.