Teams

LBK Public Mermaids

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekday · 3.5 W Thursday

19 players · average NTRP 3.55 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-22vs Royal PayneWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Margaret Sanchez vs Linda Evans / Jo Anne Cullen7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly French / Faye Blakely vs Bonita Fyala / Jane Welihozkiy3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesNancy McLean / Diana Trivax Levy vs Erika Cvencek / Mary Welch6-0, 6-2
2025-05-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisette Schroder / Faye Blakely vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-08vs Mission Valley QuigleySplit 11
L#2 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Diana Trivax Levy vs Linda Gibbs / Fiona Dias2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNancy McLean / Faye Blakely vs Cassandra McPike / Jennifer Jaworski4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-06vs Meadows SpielLost 01
L#3 DoublesBetsy Tavernier / Stephanie Kempton vs Jackie Lester / Sandra Osborne2-6, 0-6
2025-04-24vs SSC WindsorSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Margaret West vs Monica Barth / Deborah Miller2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBetsy Tavernier / Stephanie Kempton vs Polina Windsor / Brooke Belodoff6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2025-04-17vs River Strand WestonLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Betsy Tavernier vs Christie Stephenson / Susan Nicoletti4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Trivax Levy / Jeanne Jankowski vs Marina Hulbert / Vikki Parker1-6, 2-6
2025-04-10vs SSC Ross 40 SpringWon 21
L#1 DoublesDenise Fusselman / Karen Nejdawi vs Carola Ross / Sandra Poston3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Mariam Chilton vs Mauri Blefeld / Lorraine Forzani6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisette Schroder / Faye Blakely vs Donna Truex / Mona Harrington7-5, 7-5
2025-04-03vs GT Bray SenioritiasWon 20
W#2 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Mariam Chilton vs Denise Burke / Anny Rosen6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeanne Jankowski / Ashley Kube vs Nancy LeFevre / Catherine Bartlett6-2, 6-3
2025-03-27vs LWR Slice Slice BabyLost 02
L#2 DoublesJeanne Jankowski / Denise Fusselman vs Krista Sprungman / Kassandra Hugill4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Tavernier / Karen Nejdawi vs Kathleen Torrell / Susan Kwon6-1, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Margaret Sanchez
published
3.52
Ashley Kube
published 3.5
3.49
Margaret West
published
3.46
Annette Shores
published 4
3.42
Deanna Rollyson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Denise Fusselman
published 3.5
3.38
Jaisve van Rooy
published 3.5
3.38
Cynthia Caldwell
published 3.5
3.30
Mariam Chilton
published
3.29
Faye Blakely
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Betsy Tavernier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeanne Jankowski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Lisette Schroder
published
3.17
Stephanie Kempton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Karen Nejdawi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Diana Trivax Levy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kelly French
published
Nancy McLean
published
Paula Sclichter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Trivax Levy + Betsy Tavernier3547% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Tavernier + Stephanie Kempton2634% gamesnot enough data
Karen Nejdawi + Deanna Rollyson2346% gamesnot enough data
Diana Trivax Levy + Lisette Schroder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Sanchez
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.65
3.5
Ashley Kube
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.52
Margaret West
85W–79L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
4
Annette Shores
46W–50L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Deanna Rollyson
39W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Denise Fusselman
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Jaisve van Rooy
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Cynthia Caldwell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Mariam Chilton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Faye Blakely
56W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Betsy Tavernier
45W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jeanne Jankowski
79W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Lisette Schroder
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Stephanie Kempton
36W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Karen Nejdawi
41W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Diana Trivax Levy
65W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kelly French
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy McLean
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Sclichter
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.