Teams

PBurks (Life Time)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-04vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesNily Willis vs Beverly Ranger6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-31vs MPettit/KWainscott (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Courtney Reynolds6-7, 5-7
W#3 SinglesAnna McLaughlin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-22vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Coretta Wilson6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNily Willis vs Lakesha Johnson7-6, 6-1
2024-07-10vs MPettit/KWainscott (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Jennifer Margulis6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPamela Burks vs Krista Wainscott6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesNily Willis vs Elizabeth Edwards6-2, 7-5
2024-06-26vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Cynthia Staton6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesNily Willis vs Stephanie Stanton6-1, 6-2
2024-06-19vs MPettit/KWainscott (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesKandi Jackson vs Courtney Reynolds1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Jill Marcus6-2, 6-2
2024-06-11vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Beverly Ranger6-2, 6-1
2024-05-29vs MPettit/KWainscott (OPRC)Split 11
L#1 SinglesKandi Jackson vs Courtney Reynolds6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Christina McWilliams5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Emily Weigel
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.94
Christina Peterson
published 4.5
3.82
Nily Willis
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.79
Kandi Jackson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.57
Pamela Burks
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.52
Anna McLaughlin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.28
April Porter
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Burks + Emily Weigel3349% games−0.1% vs expected
Christina Peterson + Kandi Jackson224 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Burks + Christina Peterson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Weigel
163W–81L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
4.5
Christina Peterson
100W–61L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Kandi Jackson
90W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Anna McLaughlin
34W–74L career · 1 line in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
April Porter
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.