Teams

Shokes/Fuller/CCC/Foothills

2024 Foothills Spring 40 & Over League · Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-09vs vonAllmen/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Staci Shafer6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Corcoran / Carolyn Carlile vs Emily Garmon / Lisa Moore3-6, 2-6
2024-05-02vs Kim/RockBarn/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJody Cecil / Sondra Simmons vs Mitzi Arrowood / Emily Spillman3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-04-25vs Tate/LHCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Tisha Zagaroli6-1, 6-3
2024-04-23vs Davis/CRCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Sondra Simmons vs Beth Martin / Michelle Huffman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-28vs vonAllmen/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSondra Simmons / Olivia Good vs Mindy Murray / Lisa Moore3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Staci Shafer0-6, 1-6
2024-03-21vs Kim/RockBarn/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Paula Oliver6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSondra Simmons / Jody Cecil vs Sherry MacY / Marsha Phillips7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Carlile / Bonnie Schultz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-14vs Tate/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Carlile vs Beth Blair3-6, 5-7
2024-02-29vs Davis/CRCC/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Shokes / Shannon Fuller vs Beth Martin / Tracie Floyd Martin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSondra Simmons / Carolyn Carlile vs Karen Isbell / Sharon Taylor6-0, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Karen Shokes
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Sondra Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.67
Maria Sherrill
published
2.66
Olivia Good
published
2.56
Linda Corcoran
published
2.49
Bonnie Schultz
published 3
2.43
Jody Cecil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Carolyn Carlile
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Rhonda Laxton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Carlile + Jody Cecil81043% games−3.2% vs expected
Karen Shokes + Sondra Simmons1536% gamesnot enough data
Sondra Simmons + Carolyn Carlile2444% gamesnot enough data
Sondra Simmons + Jody Cecil213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Karen Shokes
176W–86L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sondra Simmons
157W–103L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Maria Sherrill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
Olivia Good
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Linda Corcoran
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Bonnie Schultz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Jody Cecil
26W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
Carolyn Carlile
51W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
Rhonda Laxton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.