Teams

Rapaport (Alper JCC)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-04-11vs Hackney (Salvadore Park)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Bleiker / Mike Fields vs Raymond Hackney / Mauricio Gomm Santos3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Rapaport / Miguel Miloslavich vs Lisardo Garcia / Denis Pierrot6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-04-03vs Kallick (Biltmore)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Bleiker / Miguel Miloslavich vs Henry Lujan / Tom Davidson3-6, 4-6
2021-03-20vs Miami-Dade - Kendalltown/CabaneLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephane Camguilhem / Charles Bleiker vs GABRIELE GHINI / Ricardo Matos Casas4-6, 3-6
2021-03-14vs Miami-Dade - Kendalltown/CabaneLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Rapaport / Charles Bleiker vs Franco Palmiotto / Ricardo Matos Casas3-6
2021-03-13vs Hackney (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephane Camguilhem / Charles Bleiker vs Mauricio Gomm Santos / Jorge Ramirez5-7, 5-7
2021-03-06vs Kallick (Biltmore)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Bleiker / Jairo Furniel vs Tom Davidson / Miguel Fundora1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMiguel Miloslavich / Robert Rapaport vs Jon Kallick / Tony Askowitz2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-02-27vs Miami-Dade - Kendalltown/CabaneLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Rapaport / Charles Bleiker vs Julio Moran / Eddy Leal3-6, 0-6
2021-02-20vs Hackney (Salvadore Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStephane Camguilhem / Charles Bleiker vs Andrew Hellinger / Danny van der Reis2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMiguel Miloslavich vs Lisardo Garcia3-6, 4-6
2021-02-13vs Kallick (Biltmore)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCharles Bleiker / Jairo Furniel vs Mitchell Stoller / Tom Davidson5-7, 2-6
2021-01-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephane Camguilhem / Charles Bleiker vs Todd Rubinstein / Tony Baumer3-6, 1-6
2021-01-23vs Kallick (Biltmore)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Bleiker / Stephane Camguilhem vs Werner Vondrak / Miguel Fundora2-6, 4-6
2021-01-16vs Miami-Dade - Kendalltown/CabaneLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephane Camguilhem / Charles Bleiker vs Marcos Lopez / Herbert Portillo0-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Charles Bleiker
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.86
Miguel Miloslavich
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Christian Walker
published 4
3.71
William Keunen
published
3.59
Genghiz Erden
published 4
Noel Barengo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Bleiker
23W–53L career · 12 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Miguel Miloslavich
24W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Christian Walker
26W–11L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
William Keunen
12W–15L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Genghiz Erden
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
Noel Barengo
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.