Teams

JNCC Newks

2025 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 7.0 Tuesday Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-30vs AH Double TroubleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGeorgia Myers / Terry Holcomb vs Patricia Phipps / Heather Stetson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJudy Moeller / Heidi Haddock vs Jean Pace / Hanh Tran6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Tuesday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kristi Schaeper
published
3.75
Tiffany May
published
3.67
Suzanna Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Terry Holcomb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Heidi Haddock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Georgia Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Debbie Grieder
published 3.5
3.24
Judy Moeller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Teresa Mirarchi
published
3.17
Kristi Bertelsman
published
3.15
Kristi Hayduk
published
3.04
Robyn Clement
published
2.95
Gena Jergins-Barlow
published
2.87
Fiona Payton
published
2.85
Julia Vlahos
published
Alice Phillips
published 3
Linda Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Moeller + Heidi Haddock7362% games+8.8% vs expected
Georgia Myers + Teresa Mirarchi134 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Haddock + Terry Holcomb404 matchesnot enough data
Georgia Myers + Terry Holcomb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristi Schaeper
6W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Tiffany May
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
Suzanna Harrison
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Terry Holcomb
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Heidi Haddock
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
Georgia Myers
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Debbie Grieder
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Judy Moeller
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Teresa Mirarchi
12W–18L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristi Bertelsman
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Kristi Hayduk
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Robyn Clement
10W–19L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Gena Jergins-Barlow
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Fiona Payton
11W–21L career · no lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.87
Julia Vlahos
6W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Alice Phillips
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Williams
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.