Teams

La.McRee18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-19vs Su.Albion18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLanier McRee / Lauren Kane vs Vickie Gibbs / Julie Helmuth6-4, 6-0
2024-05-13vs St.King18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesValerie Clowes / Shannon Grady vs Emily Palanzo / Kelly Baltzer6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Duke vs Lisa Boneham6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLanier McRee / Mary Evans vs Kelly Thompson / Bethany Stempien3-6, 2-6
2024-04-29vs St.Fogarty18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Duke / Lauren Kane vs Heath Hilliker / Shannon Aumer7-5, 7-5
2024-04-22vs Ta.Yasin18A2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesLanier McRee / Kathryn West vs Tiffany Scotton / Taqiyya Yasin7-6, 6-2
2024-04-15vs Ka.Landi18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Duke / Talya Smalls vs Ashleigh Black / Katie Landi6-2, 6-2
2024-04-01vs Ke.Blevins18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Clowes / Lauren Kane vs Kelly Blevins / Vina Jordano6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-03-18vs Me.Dougher18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesShannon Grady / Lanier McRee vs Melissa Dougher / Elizabeth Adams6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesValerie Clowes vs Erika Martin3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Shannon Grady
published
2.85
Lanier McRee
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Samantha Engel
published
2.61
Kathan Griscik
published
2.56
Kristen Duke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
Lauren Kane
published
2.36
Talya Smalls
published
2.27
Kathryn West
published
2.13
Valerie Clowes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Duke + Lanier McRee12756% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Grady
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Lanier McRee
118W–98L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Samantha Engel
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Kathan Griscik
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%22%78%
2.61
3
Kristen Duke
115W–104L career · 6 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.56
Lauren Kane
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
Talya Smalls
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.36
Kathryn West
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Valerie Clowes
64W–134L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.