Teams

1*MHanauer-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-17vs 2*EAnderson-DFCWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Edmund Malesky6-3, 6-1
2024-07-17vs 3*JByrd-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesRyan Sayko vs James Rees3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Ali Moradmand0-6, 1-6
2024-07-03vs 4*JByrd2-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Andrew Lopez3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Evan Dorner6-0, 6-3
2024-06-26vs 5*SBenson-CHTCLost 02
L#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Casey Black1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Chris Giordano0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-12vs 2*EAnderson-DFCWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Rod Snyder6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Wilkins Aquino6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs David Bluestein5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-05vs 3*JByrd-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesRyan Sayko vs Brett Eckles1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs James Rees3-6, 4-6
2024-05-29vs 5*SBenson-CHTCLost 02
L#2 SinglesJackson Cabell vs Noah Dichter2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLuc Sanchez vs Scott Benson6-7, 1-6
2024-05-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnil Chawla vs Curtis Lawson6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Zack Czajkowski
published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
published 4.5
4.14
Ryan Sayko
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Luc Sanchez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Jackson Cabell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Llewellyn + Matthew Hanauer9556% games+6.8% vs expected
Anil Chawla + Spencer Llewellyn2338% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Sayko + Spencer Llewellyn224 matchesnot enough data
Anil Chawla + Jackson Cabell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zack Czajkowski
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Ryan Sayko
78W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Luc Sanchez
26W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Jackson Cabell
44W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.