Teams

SGV LLW FLoBS-Um-Scholl CYN/SA11

2026 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 2.95 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesStefani Galvagni / Joanna Gardner vs Cristina Siruno / Noanie Rofoli6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNatalia Fernandez vs Candice Wu6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChelle Farquhar / Linda Lopez vs Jayme Magallanes / Barb Vetterick7-5, 6-0
2026-03-07vs SGV ATCC Phoenix-Yi-ATCC/SU2Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Lopez / Karen Willaman vs Cynthia Su / Diep Ho7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNatalia Fernandez vs TONI GITTER6-1, 6-0
2026-02-28vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKat Kim / Tirsa Chavez vs Linh Preston / Sachiko Kawai4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoanna Gardner / Karen Willaman vs Alisa Curiel / Eileen Yip6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Mila De La Roca / Amber Papier vs Mei Wong / Jennifer Dickson2-6, 3-4
W#1 SinglesNatalia Fernandez vs Christina Przybilla6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMonica Haulena / Sonia Chan vs Jessie Do / Keiko Handman6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLetitia Fox / Chelle Farquhar vs Austen Rachlis / Melicia Shen5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAmy Mila De La Roca / Amber Papier vs Rima Zobayan / Carly Vong5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatalia Fernandez vs Annie Xu6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTirsa Chavez / Letitia Fox vs Sharon Spangler / Eliza Llobrera6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Johanna Bentson0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Mila De La Roca / Amber Papier vs Kimberly Albright / Dede Schneider6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSonia Chan / Tirsa Chavez vs MAY-MAY SUGIHARA / Susan Brosche6-3, 6-2
2026-01-25vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10Won 30
W#1 DoublesStefani Galvagni / Amber Papier vs Alice Markowski / Joanne Yoshida7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSonia Chan / Tirsa Chavez vs Jan Li / Lisa Davila7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoanna Gardner / Monica Haulena vs Junko Noguchi / Xuejun Hou4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJulie Arshonsky / Tirsa Chavez vs Patricia McNulty / Karen Dacayo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Juliette Roberts3-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Mila De La Roca / Amber Papier vs Cerena Cooper / Irma Martinez6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · SGV - Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV LLW FLoBS-Um-Scholl CYN/SA117126617200
2SGV Rally Girls-Sugihara-Claremont Club/ Su1062201230257
3SGV Deuces Wild-Shen-Scholl Cyn-SU153151736256
4SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA226131940285
5SGV ATCC Phoenix-Yi-ATCC/SU226141842312
6SGV Rebelettes-McNulty-Dawson Park/SU1226102246303
7SGV Hot Tub Tennis Club-Beveridge-WN/SA121782450335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Stefani Galvagni
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.14
Joanna Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.10
Natalia Fernandez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Julie Arshonsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Sonia Chan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Linda Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Tirsa Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Amy Mila De La Roca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Amber Papier
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Letitia Fox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Kat Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Chelle Farquhar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Lourdes Duarte
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Leilani Scholtz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Monica Haulena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Aileen Mesina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Soleil Blaize
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Karen Willaman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Hyon A Um
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Gardner + Stefani Galvagni5073% games+22.9% vs expected
Stefani Galvagni + Karen Willaman5549% games−4.6% vs expected
Leilani Scholtz + Aileen Mesina5552% games−5.2% vs expected
Stefani Galvagni + Hyon A Um3747% gamesnot enough data
Stefani Galvagni + Soleil Blaize6366% gamesnot enough data
Stefani Galvagni + Kat Kim7165% gamesnot enough data
Hyon A Um + Aileen Mesina2445% gamesnot enough data
Joanna Gardner + Linda Lopez2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Stefani Galvagni
129W–81L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
Joanna Gardner
29W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.14
Natalia Fernandez
19W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Julie Arshonsky
130W–102L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.02
Sonia Chan
20W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Linda Lopez
27W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Tirsa Chavez
16W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Amy Mila De La Roca
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Amber Papier
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91
Letitia Fox
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Kat Kim
50W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Chelle Farquhar
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lourdes Duarte
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Leilani Scholtz
20W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Monica Haulena
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Aileen Mesina
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Soleil Blaize
58W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Karen Willaman
64W–78L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
2.5
Hyon A Um
66W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.