Teams

Steckel

2024 IA 18 & Over Adult Mixed League · 7.0 X'd 18 Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2023-12-17vs BrownLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Nesteby / Patricia Conrad vs Ann Brown / Tom Randall2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDoug Infelt / Amy Infelt vs Jake Thomsen / Malora Cosgrove0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRay Krauss / Kelly Drake vs Kristen Trovas / Tyler Wright5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-12-03vs BrownLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Novak / Mark Steckel vs Tyler Wright / Amara Andrews6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRay Krauss / Kelly Drake vs Patrick Cosgrove / Cathy Dmello2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Conrad / Frank Dileo vs Kyle Suther / Kathy Keel Moeder4-6, 4-6
2023-11-12vs CarstensenLost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniela McCue / Mark Steckel vs Kyle Suther / Ann Brown1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-15vs IA/Young/18&Over8.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesHanna Zevenbergen / Steven Nesteby vs Wahyu Boentoro / Ashley Henrichsen7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2023-10-08vs BrownLost 12
L#1 DoublesRay Krauss / Mary Milavetz vs Tim Carstensen / Kristen Trovas1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSteven Nesteby / Patricia Conrad vs Cathy Dmello / Greg Ervin6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Infelt / Kelly Drake vs Suzi Carstensen / Tyler Wright0-6, 2-6
2023-10-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesMark Steckel / Jennifer Torgerson vs Tricia Miller / Kevin Williams3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-24vs CarstensenWon 10
W#1 DoublesHanna Zevenbergen / Steven Nesteby vs Cathy Dmello / Zachary Mersch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-22vs BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Novak / Arthur Khaw vs Amara Andrews / Jake Thomsen6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Conrad / Frank Dileo vs Kathy Keel Moeder / Kyle Suther3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteven Nesteby / Kelly Drake vs Ann Brown / Tom Randall3-6, 4-6
2023-09-17vs BrownLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Steckel / Michelle Novak vs Tim Carstensen / Kristen Trovas6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFrank Dileo / Patricia Conrad vs Jake Thomsen / Malora Cosgrove3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSteven Nesteby / Mary Milavetz vs Tom Randall / Suzi Carstensen6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-02-26vs SundermannLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Novak / Mark Steckel vs Carrie Steffen / Ryan Sundermann2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-01-22vs SundermannLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Novak / Mark Steckel vs Ryan Sundermann / Lori Caldwell2-6, 4-6
2022-12-04vs SundermannLost 02
L#2 DoublesPatricia Conrad / Steven Nesteby vs Brian Steffen / Nancy Netolicky6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Graham / Mark Steckel vs Muhannad Abu Nameh / Kim Sherman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-02vs SundermannLost 01
L#3 DoublesSteven Nesteby / Patricia Conrad vs Jeremy Mead / Sarah Hemming-Meyer4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X'd 18 Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Arthur Khaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Mark Steckel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.32
Michelle Novak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Steven Nesteby
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.18
Doug Infelt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Mary Milavetz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Trisha Park
published
2.87
Kelly Drake
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Patricia Conrad
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Amy Infelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Frank Dileo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ray Krauss
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Steckel + Kelly Drake4250% games−10.9% vs expected
Ray Krauss + Mary Milavetz0735% gamesnot enough data
Mark Steckel + Trisha Park3252% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Conrad + Frank Dileo134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Conrad + Doug Infelt213 matchesnot enough data
Ray Krauss + Kelly Drake123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Infelt + Doug Infelt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arthur Khaw
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mark Steckel
27W–26L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
Michelle Novak
72W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
Steven Nesteby
26W–31L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Doug Infelt
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Mary Milavetz
22W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Trisha Park
20W–23L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.90
Kelly Drake
20W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.87
Patricia Conrad
31W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Amy Infelt
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Frank Dileo
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Krauss
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.