Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 40MX8.0A

2022 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX8.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.65 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Shane Grevin
published
3.90
Ian Hannah
published 4
Amy M Taylor
published 4
Chris Korte
published 4
3.72
Seth Petersen
published
3.63
Norma Brewer
published
3.56
Toby Tyler
published
3.54
Mary Gamble
published
3.53
Matthew Core
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.51
Kevin Dahlstedt
published
3.48
Kathy Halligan
published
3.42
Erin Henke
published 3.5
3.42
Jennifer Anakar
published
3.42
Yasha Rahimzadeh
published
3.41
Leslie Grevin
published
Erik Sherley
published 3.5
3.24
Christopher Horne
published 3.5
3.16
Tricia Hulsey
published 3.5
3.12
Alan Pilgrim
published 3.5
2.96
James Joiner
published 3.5
Karen Rocco
published
Quynh Pearson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shane Grevin + Leslie Grevin1737% games−7.9% vs expected
Yasha Rahimzadeh + Erin Henke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shane Grevin
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Ian Hannah
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Amy M Taylor
13W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Chris Korte
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Seth Petersen
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Norma Brewer
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%15%85%
3.63
Toby Tyler
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Matthew Core
122W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
Kevin Dahlstedt
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Kathy Halligan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Erin Henke
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jennifer Anakar
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Yasha Rahimzadeh
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Leslie Grevin
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Erik Sherley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Horne
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Tricia Hulsey
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Alan Pilgrim
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
James Joiner
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
Karen Rocco
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Quynh Pearson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.