Teams

LCTA40/Hinton/I'On

2022 USTA 40 & Over Spring · 40 & over Women - 3.0 Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & over Women - 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Silvia Waring
published
3.06
Meghan Webster
published
2.96
Alicia Fox
published 3
2.93
Heidi Strenck
published 3
2.89
Emily Calcagno
published 3
2.89
Roxanne Tedford
published
2.81
Cleary Simpson
published 3
2.68
Barbara Spell
published 3
2.58
Greer Vaughan
published 3
2.57
Kathryn Hinton
published
2.50
Krissie Smith
published
Karen Lewis
published
Nancy Meyer
published
Wenda Millard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Meyer + Heidi Strenck2744% games+1.6% vs expected
Meghan Webster + Nancy Meyer4547% games+0.1% vs expected
Meghan Webster + Heidi Strenck121251% games−1.4% vs expected
Greer Vaughan + Roxanne Tedford2535% games−9.8% vs expected
Kathryn Hinton + Greer Vaughan0622% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Webster + Krissie Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Hinton + Silvia Waring224 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Hinton + Roxanne Tedford123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Silvia Waring
38W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.21
Meghan Webster
54W–43L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Alicia Fox
38W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Heidi Strenck
66W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Emily Calcagno
55W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Roxanne Tedford
33W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Cleary Simpson
22W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Barbara Spell
9W–23L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Greer Vaughan
23W–46L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Kathryn Hinton
9W–40L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.57
Krissie Smith
16W–30L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
Karen Lewis
32W–63L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Meyer
20W–44L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wenda Millard
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.