Teams

TCSP-Volley Girls-Thorne

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-07vs PL-PorterWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Thorne / Mary Ransom vs Cathy Blankenship / Heather Liati1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Knobbs vs Andrea Cichanski6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Goldman / Stephanie Johnson vs Delicia Ormiston / Lisa Baisler6-1, 6-1
2021-05-31vs PL-PorterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMolly Goldman / Mary Ransom vs Cathy Blankenship / Heather Liati1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Holmstrom / Elizabeth Kardokus vs Lisa Baisler / Andrea Cichanski6-2, 6-2
2021-05-24vs BC-FreudenbergerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Goldman / Elizabeth Kardokus vs Trish MacDonald / Nur Ozkaraoglu6-7, 3-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlison Etter vs Kathryn Wenger1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Lynette / Catherine Sawicki vs Jodi Freudenberger / Sasipen Nott6-2, 5-7
2021-05-17vs ETC-HolleWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Thorne / Amy Knobbs vs Margaret Landry-Navarro / Helen Dawson7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlison Etter vs Sapna Sheth6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Darlington / Molly Goldman vs Kathleen Barth / Candis Brink3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-10vs STC-BuhlerWon 21
L#1 DoublesMolly Goldman / Mary Ransom vs Paula Congleton / Martha Draves6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Knobbs vs Krista Grinstein6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Engrav / Angie Holmstrom vs Darbie Kirk / Regan Hurley6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-03vs CAC/SL-MatterWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Thorne / Elizabeth Kardokus vs Joanny Spaulding / Nancy Whittaker6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlison Etter vs Stephanie Heffner6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Holmstrom / Stephanie Johnson vs Veronica Stordahl / Janice Thiel6-3, 6-0
2021-04-26vs CAC/SL-MatterWon 20
W#1 DoublesMolly Goldman / Elizabeth Kardokus vs Louise Radtke / Joanny Spaulding6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmy Knobbs vs Grace Park6-0, 6-1
2021-04-19vs STC-BuhlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Thorne / Mary Ransom vs Martha Draves / Paula Congleton1-6, 6-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Etter vs Shelley Buhler5-7, 4-4
L#2 DoublesTeresa Engrav / Rachel Lynette vs Corinne Crabs / Alida Oles2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCSP-Volley Girls-Thorne7117718165
2BAIN-Carrillo6015310113
3STC-Buhler6217716180
4AYTC (OUTDOORS) Sets in the City-McKay4211714136
5ETC-Holle44131127213
6MI-Kodera44111328223
7TCSP-Double Mints-Steck44131129240
8BC-Doubles or Nothing-Arjal44111329225
9FC-Basha Tennis-Lydon3381022171
10WSC-Raquettes-Onu3371124185
11PL-Porter35111327213
12BC-Freudenberger35101427214
13ETC-Slicetinis-Tang2481023179
14RBW-Group Therapy-Ferleman1771730219
15CAC/SL-Matter1742040249
16ETC-Racq Pack-Brown0621632206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Amy Knobbs
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.81
Alison Etter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Teresa Engrav
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Cigdem Mayhew
published 3
2.55
Mary Ransom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Molly Goldman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Heather Thorne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Rachel Lynette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Catherine Sawicki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Elizabeth Kardokus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.19
Angie Holmstrom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Goldman + Cigdem Mayhew3556% games+3.4% vs expected
Heather Thorne + Cigdem Mayhew4548% games−4.9% vs expected
Molly Goldman + Mary Ransom2546% games−5.5% vs expected
Amy Knobbs + Alison Etter2436% games−8.1% vs expected
Heather Thorne + Mary Ransom3349% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Kardokus + Mary Ransom134 matchesnot enough data
Cigdem Mayhew + Mary Ransom224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Kardokus + Heather Thorne213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Knobbs
42W–33L career · type A · 9 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Alison Etter
18W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Teresa Engrav
58W–69L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Cigdem Mayhew
20W–20L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
Mary Ransom
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
Molly Goldman
15W–23L career · 6 lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Heather Thorne
19W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
2.44
2.5
Rachel Lynette
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Catherine Sawicki
5W–20L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Elizabeth Kardokus
13W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Angie Holmstrom
17W–23L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.