Teams

Serving You

2021 Prince George's Combo · Combo Women 5.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Combo Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Casey Royster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Nikki Rawls
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Natalie Walker
published
2.74
Staci Steward
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Catherine Wynne
published 3
2.59
JENNIFER JOY
published 3
2.55
Beverly Taylor
published 3
2.50
Wanda Fells
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Thaddisa Fulwood
published
Vene Lagon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Staci Steward + Wanda Fells6944% games−5.7% vs expected
Casey Royster + Staci Steward4248% gamesnot enough data
Nikki Rawls + Staci Steward123 matchesnot enough data
Casey Royster + Wanda Fells123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Royster
192W–200L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Nikki Rawls
56W–71L career · 1 line in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
Natalie Walker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Staci Steward
120W–166L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Catherine Wynne
12W–21L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
JENNIFER JOY
20W–29L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Beverly Taylor
8W–16L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Wanda Fells
22W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
2.50
Thaddisa Fulwood
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vene Lagon
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.