Teams

WIKIUP R SC CM7.5A

2023 COMBO · Men 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-31vs LA CANTERA RC CM7.5ASplit 11
L#2 DoublesNathan Strong / Daniel Musgrove vs Yanzhu Wen / David Moeller6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRoy Peterka / Selvan Ekambaram vs Trevor Mcguire / Mike Gallagher6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesTom Frisher / Brian Johnson vs Yasha Rahimzadeh / Barry Richter6-3, 6-3
2023-10-14vs LA CANTERA RC CM7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoy Peterka / Brian Johnson vs Don Ameral / Mark Latimer6-2, 6-2
2023-09-30vs FOUNTAINGROVE-AC CM7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Suiker / Brian Johnson vs Nick Grudzien / Matt Walls6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Johnson / Nathan Strong vs Kevin O'Malley / Art Ramsey6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKevin Suiker / Brian Johnson vs Matthew Core / Ian Hannah6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-05vs FOUNTAINGROVE-AC CM7.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJamin Ruark / Brian Johnson vs Vivek Kumra / Matt Walls6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jamin Ruark
published 4
3.98
Roy Peterka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.88
Weldon Ryckman
published
3.87
Tom Frisher
published
3.81
Nathan Strong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Douglas Oclassen
published 4
3.73
Jon Moens
published
3.66
Selvan Ekambaram
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Renz Hoppe
published
3.46
Craig Lucas
published 3.5
3.36
Kevin Garvin
published
3.25
Abdel Aziz Zhari
published 3.5
Jesse Lorz
published
Razi Arifuddin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roy Peterka + Nathan Strong11065% games+10.8% vs expected
Abdel Aziz Zhari + Selvan Ekambaram314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamin Ruark
21W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
Roy Peterka
14W–0L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Brian Johnson
77W–55L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
Weldon Ryckman
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Tom Frisher
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
Nathan Strong
14W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Douglas Oclassen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Moens
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Selvan Ekambaram
25W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.66
Renz Hoppe
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Craig Lucas
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Kevin Garvin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Abdel Aziz Zhari
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Jesse Lorz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Razi Arifuddin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.