Teams

BC-Kramer/SarahPucci

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-02vs SoCal/Stephens/40&Over3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesStacey Derr / Laura Malandrino vs Corey Henkle / Sarah Sapiro4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRegina Enriquez vs Erika Wadler6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Kim / Katya Rodriguez vs Kathleen Stephens / Stephanie Deur7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-19vs SoCal/Stephens/40&Over3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesStacey Derr / Laura Malandrino vs Kathleen Stephens / Corey Henkle4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVi Schwartz vs Nicole Pacourek3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGina Brady / Clara Inciso-Brevig vs Ashley Goldsmith / Alex Sheehan0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Onwilasinee Stern
published
3.22
Stacey Derr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Regina Enriquez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Katya Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Alina Mikolaitis
published 3
2.93
Kelly Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Laura Malandrino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
2.73
Vi Schwartz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.70
Clara Inciso-Brevig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Jill Medawar
published
2.55
Gina Brady
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Meagan Patterson
published
2.23
Sarah Pucci
published
Grace Coopman
published
Jennifer Pucher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Malandrino + Stacey Derr9263% games+8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Onwilasinee Stern
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Stacey Derr
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Regina Enriquez
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Katya Rodriguez
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Alina Mikolaitis
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Kelly Kim
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Laura Malandrino
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Chrissy Karasavas
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Vi Schwartz
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Clara Inciso-Brevig
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Jill Medawar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Gina Brady
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Meagan Patterson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Sarah Pucci
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.23
Grace Coopman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Pucher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.