Teams

MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW4.0A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aina Lu
published 4.5
3.87
Kim Halvorsen
published
3.87
Rose Madriaga
published
3.85
Lisa Cabassa
published
3.85
Joma Ann Raniel
published
3.73
Lenka Quinanola
published
3.71
3.65
Julie Dean
published
3.61
Kate B Gillis
published
3.61
Mhavz Malado
published
3.60
Bonnie Chamchawee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Maria Townsend
published
3.50
Abbie Serrano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Tamara Tarkington
published
3.44
Jenny Ford
published
3.40
Samantha Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Denise Galocy
published 3.5
3.25
Amber Diaz-Garcia
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Madriaga + Joma Ann Raniel9073% games+19.8% vs expected
Mhavz Malado + Joma Ann Raniel224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Townsend + Kim Halvorsen213 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Zhang + Abbie Serrano213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aina Lu
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Halvorsen
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Rose Madriaga
25W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Lisa Cabassa
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Joma Ann Raniel
30W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.85
Lenka Quinanola
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Lienchi Jamie Nguyen
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Julie Dean
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Kate B Gillis
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Mhavz Malado
39W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Bonnie Chamchawee
83W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Maria Townsend
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Abbie Serrano
36W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Tamara Tarkington
21W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jenny Ford
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Samantha Zhang
23W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Denise Galocy
21W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Amber Diaz-Garcia
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.