Teams

HMTC RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-28vs CSU WHITEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaurie Anderson / Vicki Davis vs Cynthia McGrorey / Anja Mau6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Dee Woodcock6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHelen Crews / Mary Wilson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-21vs CSU GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Wilson / Vicki Davis vs Rachel Robertson / Erin Pasold7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Meredith Lorick2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Crews / Laurie Anderson vs Rachel Fernandez-Grant / Mel Fernandez6-7, 3-6
2024-08-14vs CSU GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Crews / Mary Wilson vs Sarah Soffe / Cathy Thomas1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Alison Earnhart6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVicki Davis / Laurie Anderson vs Becky Rosetti-Solley / Carrie Galyardt1-6, 3-6
2024-08-07vs LVTA SILVERLost 02
L#1 DoublesHelen Crews / Vicki Davis vs Jill Hartman / Anna Jarman3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Renee Davis1-6, 6-7
2024-08-03vs LVTA SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesHelen Crews / Mary Wilson vs Trish Lebsack / Mischel Ebon Libunao6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Anna Jarman2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Davis / Laurie Anderson vs Shelli Friesen / Linda Miller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-24vs CSU WHITEWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelen Crews / Mary Wilson vs Priscilla Dressen / Peggy Johnson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCYNDI ROTHMAN vs Cynthia McGrorey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVicki Davis / Cheri Gipson vs Edie LaFonte / Carolyn Guernsey6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Vicki Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
CYNDI ROTHMAN
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Cheri Gipson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Helen Crews
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Davis + Cheri Gipson5453% games+1.3% vs expected
Cheri Gipson + Helen Crews6549% games−3.1% vs expected
Vicki Davis + Helen Crews1450% gamesnot enough data
Cheri Gipson + CYNDI ROTHMAN224 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Davis + CYNDI ROTHMAN123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vicki Davis
46W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
CYNDI ROTHMAN
68W–71L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cheri Gipson
45W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Helen Crews
61W–55L career · 6 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.